W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: WebKit interest in ServiceWorkers (was Re: [manifest] Utility of bookmarking to home screen, was V1 ready for wider review)

From: Jungkee Song <jungkees@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:57:18 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGwV++fnNNmMXw0Wcm-OdQans6YazPs-Wud8M7F=wx0Asw5MYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, WG Webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote:

> On 2/17/14 8:03 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> On Monday, February 17, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>  BTW, I noticed there is no Bugzilla component for Service
>>> Workers so I will ask Mike Smith to create one).
>> I think they bug tracker on GH is being used instead. It's already very
>> active and it would be a shame to have to move to Bugzilla.
> I don't have a strong preference (Bugzilla vs. GH Issues) but I do think
> only one should be used and supported. Note the ED includes the following:
> [[
> Participate
>    File bugs
>    <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?comment=&
> blocked=14968&short_desc=%5BCustom%5D%3A%20&product=
> WebAppsWG&component=Service%20Workers>(w3.org'sBugzilla
>    <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>)
> ]]
> So I naturally assumed Bugzilla would be used (and if this isn't the case
> the above should be fixed/clarified).
The work has been done in the GH repo and all the actual players are
actively collaborating there using the GH issues. I think we should keep
using it unless otherwise determined by the contributors. I'll fix the
above text to point to the GH issues.

> -Thanks, AB


Jungkee Song
Received on Monday, 17 February 2014 13:57:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:22 UTC