public-web-intents@w3.org from February 2012 by author

Ben Adida

• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Thursday, 16 February)

Charles Pritchard

• Re: Using HTML5 Channel Messaging with Web Intents to create persistent relations (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Puzzled by the demos (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Exploring an Intents protocol for web messaging (Sunday, 12 February)
• Exploring an Intents protocol for web messaging (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: WebIntents to launch native applications (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: ARIA mapping of intent (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: ARIA mapping of intent (Wednesday, 1 February)
• ARIA mapping of intent (Wednesday, 1 February)

Dave Raggett

• Re: web intent semantics? (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: web intent semantics? (Tuesday, 21 February)
• web intent semantics? (Tuesday, 21 February)

Dominic Cooney

• Re: ARIA mapping of intent (Wednesday, 1 February)

Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com

• Re: drafting March f2f agenda (Thursday, 16 February)

Giuseppe Pascale

• Re: Proposal for using web intents for a print intent (Thursday, 2 February)

Greg Billock

• Re: Using HTML5 Channel Messaging with Web Intents to create persistent relations (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Using HTML5 Channel Messaging with Web Intents to create persistent relations (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: web intent semantics? (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: WebIntents to launch native applications (Saturday, 11 February)

Imran Zaman

• WebIntents to launch native applications (Friday, 10 February)

James Hawkins

• Re: Using HTML5 Channel Messaging with Web Intents to create persistent relations (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: web intent semantics? (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: web intent semantics? (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: WebIntents to launch native applications (Friday, 17 February)
• Proposal to deprecate RPH/RCH via Web Intents posted on WhatWG (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Friday, 10 February)

John J Barton

• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: web intent semantics? (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Puzzled by the demos (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Puzzled by the demos (Monday, 13 February)
• Puzzled by the demos (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Exploring an Intents protocol for web messaging (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: Exploring an Intents protocol for web messaging (Sunday, 12 February)

KOMATSU Kensaku

• Re: Using HTML5 Channel Messaging with Web Intents to create persistent relations (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: WebIntents to launch native applications (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: WebIntents to launch native applications (Saturday, 11 February)

Mark Hammond

• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Thursday, 16 February)
• A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Friday, 10 February)

Nilsson, Claes1

• RE: Using HTML5 Channel Messaging with Web Intents to create persistent relations (Thursday, 23 February)
• Using HTML5 Channel Messaging with Web Intents to create persistent relations (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: drafting March f2f agenda (Thursday, 16 February)

Paul Kinlan

• Re: Using HTML5 Channel Messaging with Web Intents to create persistent relations (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Using HTML5 Channel Messaging with Web Intents to create persistent relations (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: web intent semantics? (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: web intent semantics? (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: Puzzled by the demos (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Puzzled by the demos (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Exploring an Intents protocol for web messaging (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: ARIA mapping of intent (Wednesday, 1 February)

Rachel Blum

• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? (Friday, 17 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 23 February 2012 11:48:45 UTC