Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents?

why?

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 4:38 PM, John J Barton
<johnjbarton@johnjbarton.com>wrote:

> Ok, thanks for the info. Sounds like we will have to look elsewhere
> for a cross-domain application integration framework.
> jjb
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Paul Kinlan <paulkinlan@google.com>
> wrote:
> > No.  The shim blocks all registrations from occurring inside an iframe.
>  I
> > would expect the native implementation to do the same.  If the spec
> doesn't
> > mention this, it should.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:55 PM, John J Barton
> > <johnjbarton@johnjbarton.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Rachel Blum <groby@google.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> > Why wouldn't I race James to create WorldsMostAwesomeWebIntents
> page
> >> >> > full of <intent> tags?
> >> >> > Won't people be motivated to create ad supported lists? Won't users
> >> >> > be
> >> >> > bombarded with <intent> pages?
> >> >> > I guess these are problems you'd love to have.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Let's keep in mind that (unless I misremember) intent tags have a
> >> > same-origin restriction on the action path.
> >> >
> >> > So you'll actually need to do a bit of work beyond just collecting
> tags
> >> > on
> >> > your page - unless you choose to provide no-op intents.
> >>
> >> I guess a page full of
> >> <iframe src=<page-with-intent-tag>>
> >> wouid work, right?
> >>
> >> jjb
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Rachel
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Paul Kinlan
> > Developer Advocate @ Google for Chrome and HTML5
> > G+: http://plus.ly/paul.kinlan
> > t: +447730517944
> > tw: @Paul_Kinlan
> > LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/paulkinlan
> > Blog: http://paul.kinlan.me
> > Skype: paul.kinlan
> >
>



-- 
Paul Kinlan
Developer Advocate @ Google for Chrome and HTML5
G+: http://plus.ly/paul.kinlan
t: +447730517944
tw: @Paul_Kinlan
LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/paulkinlan
Blog: http://paul.kinlan.me
Skype: paul.kinlan