No. The shim blocks all registrations from occurring inside an iframe. I would expect the native implementation to do the same. If the spec doesn't mention this, it should. On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:55 PM, John J Barton <johnjbarton@johnjbarton.com > wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Rachel Blum <groby@google.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > Why wouldn't I race James to create WorldsMostAwesomeWebIntents page > >> > full of <intent> tags? > >> > Won't people be motivated to create ad supported lists? Won't users be > >> > bombarded with <intent> pages? > >> > I guess these are problems you'd love to have. > > > > > > Let's keep in mind that (unless I misremember) intent tags have a > > same-origin restriction on the action path. > > > > So you'll actually need to do a bit of work beyond just collecting tags > on > > your page - unless you choose to provide no-op intents. > > I guess a page full of > <iframe src=<page-with-intent-tag>> > wouid work, right? > > jjb > > > > > > Rachel > > -- Paul Kinlan Developer Advocate @ Google for Chrome and HTML5 G+: http://plus.ly/paul.kinlan t: +447730517944 tw: @Paul_Kinlan LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/paulkinlan Blog: http://paul.kinlan.me Skype: paul.kinlan
Received on Monday, 20 February 2012 13:02:37 UTC