- From: Nilsson, Claes1 <Claes1.Nilsson@sonyericsson.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:58:03 +0100
- To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "public-web-intents@w3.org" <public-web-intents@w3.org>
Hi Frederick, I would like to include a discussion on Web Intents in the context of local services according to the discussion on the mailing list and proposals on the wiki: http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebIntents/Home_Discovery_and_Web_Intents Furthermore, the discussion on a simplified approach to Web Intents needs to addressed at the meeting. So, I am considering if just one day is enough for Web Intents. Continuing with Web Intents in the morning of day 2 might be needed (under the assumption that interested people will stay). Regards Claes > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com] > Sent: den 14 februari 2012 23:16 > To: public-device-apis@w3.org > Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com > Subject: drafting March f2f agenda > > I have created a rough draft for an agenda for the F2F 20-22 March to > help us review and create an agenda, see > http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/F2F_Agenda_20- > 22_March_2012,_Shenzhen,_China > > http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/wiki/F2F_Agenda_20- > 22_March_2012,_Shenzhen,_China#Day_3.2C_Thursday_22_March_2012_.289_am_ > -_4_pm.29 > > Some thoughts: > > 1) WebIntents on Day 1 reflects our general agreement to review and > progress WebIntents on day !. I also think it would be useful to review > how we intend to progress Contacts given our understanding of > WebIntents. We probably should also review and plan to document > privacy/security of device APIs in the context of WebIntents. > > 2) I suggest the WG as a whole should understand the status of the > Media Capture task force, perhaps a member of that task force can > volunteer to lead a session to review and discuss that work. This can > help socialize the work and also encourage additional participation and > feedback to the TF. > > 3) We probably should consider how to move Battery and Vibration to CR, > this might happen on a teleconference before the F2F (after 1 March for > Vibration), but maybe it is an appropriate decision for the F2F. > > 4) Although work on test cases and interop can happen out of the main > WG calls, maybe we can start work on this at the F2F, raising any > issues we might have. > > Timings and topics are all a rough take, just to get us started. If you > plan to call in, you should indicate if a topic you can contribute to > should be moved in the schedule. I'm not sure we can juggle everything > to everyone's satisfaction, but we can try. We also need to get a clear > understanding of who plans to attend in person, and who plans to call > in, including those working on WebIntents that are not in DAP. > > I tentatively put 9-5 for day 1, 2 and 9-4 for day 3, but we should > discuss. > > Do you see any missing topics? > > thanks > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch, Nokia > Co-Chair, W3C DAP Working Group > > > >
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 13:58:36 UTC