- From: Bruce Bailey <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 19:54:57 +0000
- To: "WCAG 2.x issues list (public-wcag2-issues@w3.org)" <public-wcag2-issues@w3.org>
- CC: Scott O'Hara <scott.ohara@microsoft.com>
- Message-ID: <MW5PR22MB35111B2D3F2C88D766733F8FE3792@MW5PR22MB3511.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
My notes from today’s call follow. Attendance (13): Alastair Campbell, Bruce Bailey, Dan Bjorge, David Cox, Duff Johnson, Francis Storr, Giacomo Petri, Gundula Niemann, Lori Oakley, Mike Gifford, Patrick Lauke, Scott O’Hara, Theo Hale. Regrets: Mike Gower 1. For discussion * Add two notes/clarifications to 2.1.1/2.1.3 understanding by patrickhlauke · Pull Request #1642<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1642> we discussed minor edits since last week and is Ready for approval. * 3.1.3 Unusual Words seems contradictory about words with "restricted" meaning · Issue #3606<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/3606> discussion, status set to In progress. * Add anti-aliasing note to 1.4.11 by patrickhlauke · Pull Request #3560<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3560> discussed and Ready for approval. 2. Drafted * 3.1.3 Unusual Words and neologisms/slang/made-up words · Issue #3591<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/3591> discussed in conjunction with issue 3606 (above) and is In progress. * Update accessible-authentication-minimum.html by bruce-usab · Pull Request #3309<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3309> Ready for approval but is not sufficient for closing 3.3.8/3.3.9: How is "authentication process" defined? · Issue #3264<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/3264> which has its status reverted as To do. * Remove technique H59 by patrickhlauke · Pull Request #2970<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2970> discussed and Ready for approval. 3. To do [skipped] 4. Open discussion: Duff previewed the PDF Association work, see link below from email yesterday. Please be encouraged to self-assign To do items and change status to In progress. From: Bruce Bailey Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 5:25 PM To: WCAG 2.x issues list (public-wcag2-issues@w3.org) <public-wcag2-issues@w3.org> Subject: RE: WCAG 2.x issues call, 1/26 Group, I will be watching the clock because I really do want to leave some time at the end of the call for open discussion. In particular, I would like to spend a little time discussing recruiting additional resources. I think a great example is the PDF Association’s forthcoming Techniques for accessible PDFs and how they propose support for findability. Please see: PDF techniques for accessibility: a new model<https://pdfa.org/pdf-techniques-for-accessibility-a-new-model/>. Another example, from the U.S. federal sphere, is the ICT Testing Baseline for Web<https://ictbaseline.access-board.gov/01Keyboard/>. Currently, that just pulls from Understanding. The participants there will soon shift efforts to writing up new techniques. Thanks, Bruce From: Bruce Bailey Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 2:21 PM To: WCAG 2.x issues list (public-wcag2-issues@w3.org<mailto:public-wcag2-issues@w3.org>) <public-wcag2-issues@w3.org<mailto:public-wcag2-issues@w3.org>> Subject: WCAG 2.x issues call, 1/26 The WCAG 2 issues task force meets tomorrow (1/26) at our usual time (11:00am Eastern) and working on current issues<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22WCAG+2.2%22+-label%3A%22Survey+-+Ready+for%22++-label%3A%22Survey+-+Added%22>. You must be logged in for the Zoom link<https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/12f8250b-23af-4dc1-b25c-6285873846ce/20240119T110000/> and project board<https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/56> view. We will be following our standing agenda: 1. Review ‘For discussion’ items (15 min). 2. Review ‘Drafted’ items (30 min), either: * move back to In progress, with more work to do; * move to Ready for approval, if there is general agreement the issue is sufficiently resolved; or * leave in Drafted, if discussion was not concluded satisfactorily. 3. Review ‘To do’ (15 min). 4. Time permitting, items of interest to participants, including open discussions. Regrets from Mike Gower I may be calling on assignees (if on the call) to characterize proposed file changes or to make brief notes the PRs or Issues that we discuss. This task force process<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/wiki/WCAG-2-Task-Force-process> (among other information) is on the GitHub wiki.
Received on Friday, 26 January 2024 19:55:08 UTC