public-wai-evaltf@w3.org from June 2012 by date

Friday, 29 June 2012

• Eval TF Questionnaire 3 Velleman, Eric

Thursday, 28 June 2012

• Re: Scalability - All or sample pages Shadi Abou-Zahra
• proposed definition for "website part" Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Scalability - All or sample pages RichardWarren
• Regrets Detlev Fischer
• RE: DoC ID 25: "Person or organization" Sarah Swierenga
• Re: Agenda EvalTF Kerstin Probiesch
• Re: Agenda EvalTF Moe Kraft
• AW: Proposal for next Questionnaire (was: Re: A question about Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible) Kerstin Probiesch
• Re: Proposal for next Questionnaire (was: Re: A question about Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible) Detlev Fischer
• Re: Proposal for next Questionnaire (was: Re: A question about Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible) Shadi Abou-Zahra
• RE: DoC ID 25: "Person or organization" Vivienne CONWAY

Wednesday, 27 June 2012

• RE: Agenda EvalTF Boland Jr, Frederick E.
• RE: DoC ID 25: "Person or organization" Boland Jr, Frederick E.
• RE: DoC ID 18 – Contradict Boland Jr, Frederick E.
• RE: DoC ID 25: "Person or organization" Boland Jr, Frederick E.
• Regrets for telecon Alistair Garrison
• RE: RE: Proposal for next Questionnaire (was: Re: A question about Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible) Velleman, Eric
• Re: RE: Proposal for next Questionnaire (was: Re: A question about Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible) detlev.fischer@testkreis.de
• RE: Proposal for next Questionnaire (was: Re: A question about Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible) Velleman, Eric
• Proposal for next Questionnaire (was: Re: A question about Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible) detlev.fischer@testkreis.de
• RE: DoC ID 4: Change language Kathleen Wahlbin
• RE: DoC ID 18 - Contradict Kathleen Wahlbin
• Re: DoC ID 4: Change language Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: DoC ID 25: "Person or organization" Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: DoC ID 18 – Contradict Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: All pages Shadi Abou-Zahra

Tuesday, 26 June 2012

• Re: DoC ID 4: Change language Peter Korn
• RE: DoC ID 25: "Person or organization" Kathleen Wahlbin
• Re: DoC ID 18 – Contradict Peter Korn
• EvalTF New Questionnaire 3 Velleman, Eric
• DoC ID 18 – Contradict Velleman, Eric
• Re: DoC ID 25: "Person or organization" RichardWarren
• Agenda EvalTF Velleman, Eric
• DoC ID 4: Change language Velleman, Eric
• Re: DoC ID 25: "Person or organization" Peter Korn
• DoC ID 25: "Person or organization" Velleman, Eric
• Efficient auditing - small sites - no sampling RichardWarren
• Re: All pages Alistair Garrison
• Re: All pages RichardWarren
• Re: Fwd: WCAG 2.0 is now an ISO standard Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Fwd: WCAG 2.0 is now an ISO standard Alistair Garrison
• Re: All pages Shadi Abou-Zahra
• RE: All pages Kathleen Wahlbin
• Re: All pages Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: All pages Alistair Garrison
• Re: A question about Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: All pages Shadi Abou-Zahra
• A question about Step 4.b: Use WCAG 2.0 Techniques Where Possible Detlev Fischer

Monday, 25 June 2012

• Re: All pages RichardWarren
• Re: All pages Michael S Elledge
• Re: All pages Alistair Garrison
• Re: AW: Aspects of an evaluator Kerstin Probiesch
• RE: AW: Aspects of an evaluator Vivienne CONWAY

Sunday, 24 June 2012

• Re: AW: Aspects of an evaluator RichardWarren
• AW: Aspects of an evaluator Kerstin Probiesch

Friday, 22 June 2012

• Fwd: TPAC 2012 Registration Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: All pages RichardWarren
• All pages Alistair Garrison
• All pages Alistair Garrison
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator Alistair Garrison
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator RichardWarren
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator Detlev Fischer
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator Alistair Garrison
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator kvotis@iti.gr

Thursday, 21 June 2012

• Re: Aspects of an evaluator Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator Peter Korn
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator Alistair Garrison
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator Peter Korn
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator Alistair Garrison
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator Peter Korn
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator Alistair Garrison
• Re: Aspects of an evaluator Peter Korn
• Aspects of an evaluator Alistair Garrison
• Minutes for Teleconference on 21 June 2012 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• RE: Agenda EvalTF Fong, Elizabeth N.
• Re: EvalTF Discussion about 3.2d Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Agenda EvalTF Aurélien Levy
• AW: Agenda EvalTF Kerstin Probiesch

Wednesday, 20 June 2012

• Re: Agenda EvalTF Shadi Abou-Zahra
• RE: Agenda EvalTF Sarah Swierenga
• EvalTF Reminder this weeks questionnaire Velleman, Eric
• Agenda EvalTF Velleman, Eric
• EvalTF Discussion about 3.2d Velleman, Eric

Monday, 18 June 2012

• Minutes for Teleconference on 14 June 2012 Shadi Abou-Zahra

Sunday, 17 June 2012

• EvalTF - New Questionnaire Velleman, Eric

Friday, 15 June 2012

• Re: AW: [off topic] Re: WCAG EM and M376/D4 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• AW: [off topic] Re: WCAG EM and M376/D4 Kerstin Probiesch

Thursday, 14 June 2012

• [off topic] Re: WCAG EM and M376/D4 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• WCAG EM and M376/D4 Kerstin Probiesch
• AW: Techniques, Procedures, and Checklists (aside) Kerstin Probiesch
• Re: Techniques, Procedures, and Checklists (aside) Michael S Elledge
• Re: Techniques, Procedures, and Checklists (aside) Alistair Garrison
• AW: [attempted summary] Techniques, Procedures, and Checklists Kerstin Probiesch
• use of Techniques (was Re: [attempted summary] Techniques, Procedures, and Checklists) Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Purpose of Step 1.e (was Re: [attempted summary] Techniques, Procedures, and Checklists) Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: [attempted summary] Techniques, Procedures, and Checklists Alistair Garrison
• Re: [attempted summary] Techniques, Procedures, and Checklists RichardWarren
• Re: [attempted summary] Techniques, Procedures, and Checklists Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: [attempted summary] Techniques, Procedures, and Checklists Alistair Garrison
• [attempted summary] Techniques, Procedures, and Checklists Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Agenda EvalTF Velleman, Eric
• Re: Success, Failure techniques - side issue for discussion Alistair Garrison
• RE: Success, Failure techniques - side issue for discussion Vivienne CONWAY

Wednesday, 13 June 2012

• AW: Success, Failure techniques - side issue for discussion Kerstin Probiesch
• Re: Success, Failure techniques - side issue for discussion RichardWarren
• Re: Success, Failure techniques - side issue for discussion Alistair Garrison
• Re: Success, Failure techniques - side issue for discussion RichardWarren
• Re: Re: Success, Failure techniques - side issue for discussion detlev.fischer@testkreis.de
• Re: Success, Failure techniques - side issue for discussion Alistair Garrison
• Re: Re: Success, Failure techniques - side issue for discussion detlev.fischer@testkreis.de
• Re: Success, Failure techniques - side issue for discussion RichardWarren
• Re: Success, Failure techniques - side issue for discussion Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Success, Failure techniques - side issue for discussion RichardWarren
• Re: difference between techniques and procedures Alistair Garrison
• AW: difference between techniques and procedures Kerstin Probiesch
• Success, Failure techniques - side issue for discussion RichardWarren
• Re: Re: difference between techniques and procedures detlev.fischer@testkreis.de
• Re: difference between techniques and procedures RichardWarren
• Re: difference between techniques and procedures Alistair Garrison
• Re: difference between techniques and procedures Kerstin Probiesch

Tuesday, 12 June 2012

• Re: difference between techniques and procedures Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: difference between techniques and procedures Michael S Elledge

Sunday, 10 June 2012

• EvalTF Questionnaire for Disposition of Comments Velleman, Eric

Saturday, 9 June 2012

• RE: difference between techniques and procedures Vivienne CONWAY

Friday, 8 June 2012

• Re: difference between techniques and procedures Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: difference between techniques and procedures Kerstin Probiesch
• Re: difference between techniques and procedures RichardWarren
• Re: difference between techniques and procedures Kerstin Probiesch
• Re: difference between techniques and procedures Shadi Abou-Zahra

Thursday, 7 June 2012

• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques as used Shadi Abou-Zahra
• *reminder* No meeting on 7 June 2012 Shadi Abou-Zahra

Monday, 4 June 2012

• Regrets Alistair Garrison

Sunday, 3 June 2012

• RE: difference between techniques and procedures Vivienne CONWAY

Saturday, 2 June 2012

• Re: difference between techniques and procedures Kerstin Probiesch
• Re: difference between techniques and procedures Aurélien Levy
• Re: difference between techniques and procedures Alistair Garrison
• difference between techniques and procedures RichardWarren
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques as used Kerstin Probiesch

Friday, 1 June 2012

• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques as used Aurélien Levy
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques as used Alistair Garrison
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques as used RichardWarren
• No meeting on 7 June 2012 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Minutes for Teleconference on 31 May 2012 Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques to be used Alistair Garrison
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques to be used Aurélien Levy
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques to be used RichardWarren
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques to be used Alistair Garrison
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques to be used Aurélien Levy
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques to be used Detlev Fischer
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques to be used Alistair Garrison
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques to be used Detlev Fischer
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques to be used Aurélien Levy
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques to be used Detlev Fischer
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques to be used Alistair Garrison
• Re: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques to be used Detlev Fischer
• RE: Step 1.e: Define the Techniques to be used Vivienne CONWAY

Last message date: Friday, 29 June 2012 11:40:18 UTC