- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:01:53 +0200
- To: Alistair Garrison <alistair.j.garrison@gmail.com>
- CC: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Alistair, Having followed this thread but missed today's phone call, what is the problem with the current definition of "Evaluator"? Best, Shadi On 21.6.2012 19:02, Alistair Garrison wrote: > Dear all, > > In today's telecon, we discussed terms like independent when talking about evaluations. The outcome appeared to be that what was needed was in fact a better definition for 'evaluator'. > > I'm not going to propose the whole definition for 'evaluator', however, just two aspects which we might consider including in the definition: > > Aspect 1) (of an evaluator) someone who is not responsible for the accessibility of the website being evaluated. > Aspect 2) (of an evaluator) someone who is not associated with developing and maintaining the website or its content. > > Thoughts… > > All the best > > Alistair > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 22:02:21 UTC