- From: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:35:27 +0200
- To: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi all, I'd like to hear your views regarding a particular problem when using Sufficient Techniques to check whether a page conforms. I take it that generally, the procedure might look like this: 1. Check if one of the numbered Sufficient Techniques (or options grouping techniques) has been used successfully 2. Check whether another (yet undocumented) Technique has been used AND can be deemed sufficient / AT-supported 3. Check if one of the Failures documented for that SC applies As we work through a page, there will often be situations where particular instances of content use one technique and other instances use a different technique. This is quite acceptable for images, links, form controls, etc. For some SC, however, the situation is more complex, and I would like to hear whether you think that mixing different techniques for meeting the SC on a page would also be OK in these cases. Two examples: 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) Most parts of text satisfy G18 (sufficient default contrast). Some other parts have insufficent contrast but satisfy the SC via Technique G174 (style switcher). The switch may be far off the part of text triggering the need to activate it - for example, at the page start. 2.4.1 Bypass blocks Some sections can be bypassed by using skip links (G123), some other parts use (hidden) headings (H69), one submenu can be bypassed by being collapsible/expandable (SCR28) Especially in the second example the problem is obvious: there is no consistent way to bypass blocks, which could be quite irritating. However, all content can be bypassed using one or the other of documented sufficient techniques. Should WCAG-EM explicitly address this issue? If so, how? This is not a leading question. I am really uncertain about the best way to deal with this issue. I just feel it should not be down to personal evaluator preferences. Regards, Detlev -- Detlev Fischer testkreis - das Accessibility-Team von feld.wald.wiese c/o feld.wald.wiese Borselstraße 3-7 (im Hof) 22765 Hamburg Tel +49 (0)40 439 10 68-3 Mobil +49 (0)1577 170 73 84 Fax +49 (0)40 439 10 68-5 http://www.testkreis.de Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 07:26:29 UTC