public-w3process@w3.org from February 2015 by date

Saturday, 28 February 2015

[Issue-152] Note for Draft Process Document Stephen Zilles

Tuesday, 24 February 2015

RESOLUTION: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 Stephen Zilles
Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 24 February 2015 David Singer
Agenda Process Document Task Force 24 February 2015 Stephen Zilles
Agenda Process Document Task Force 24 February 2015 Stephen Zilles

Tuesday, 17 February 2015

Cancelled: Process Document Task Force Telcon for 17 February Stephen Zilles

Thursday, 12 February 2015

RE: w3process-ISSUE-158 (New or continued WG?): Does rechartering extinguish a WG or continue it? [Process Document] Léonie Watson
Re: w3process-ISSUE-158 (New or continued WG?): Does rechartering extinguish a WG or continue it? [Process Document] chaals@yandex-team.ru
Re: w3process-ISSUE-158 (New or continued WG?): Does rechartering extinguish a WG or continue it? [Process Document] Wayne Carr
w3process-ISSUE-158 (New or continued WG?): Does rechartering extinguish a WG or continue it? [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-157 (editorial CR revision): Requirements for republishing a CR with non-substantive changes [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 10 February 2015

Re: w3process-ISSUE-155 (Errata Access in RECs): Errata access from TR page [Process Document] chaals@yandex-team.ru

Monday, 9 February 2015

RE: w3process-ISSUE-155 (Errata Access in RECs): Errata access from TR page [Process Document] Stephen Zilles
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 Jeff Jaffe
Re: w3process-ISSUE-155 (Errata Access in RECs): Errata access from TR page [Process Document] Jeff Jaffe
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 David Singer
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 David Singer
Re: w3process-ISSUE-155 (Errata Access in RECs): Errata access from TR page [Process Document] David Singer
Should there be a Public Channel for AC Review Comments (was ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154) Stephen Zilles
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 chaals@yandex-team.ru
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 chaals@yandex-team.ru
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 Delfí Ramírez
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 Doug Schepers

Sunday, 8 February 2015

Re: Advisory Board Will Review of the Current Editor's Draft of Process2015 on February 12, 2015 fantasai
Re: Advisory Board Will Review of the Current Editor's Draft of Process2015 on February 12, 2015 fantasai
Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 fantasai
ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 Stephen Zilles
Re: w3process-ISSUE-156 (Errata vs REC track process): Do we need separate Errata and REC Track Processes? [Process Document] chaals@yandex-team.ru
Issue timing Re: w3process-ISSUE-155 (Errata Access in RECs): Errata access from TR page [Process Document] chaals@yandex-team.ru
List of Issue in the Revising the W3C Process Tracket that are Not Currently viewed as being In Scope for the Process Document TF Stephen Zilles
List of Process Document Issue Not Currently Covered in the Process 2015 Draft being reviewed Stephen Zilles
w3process-ISSUE-156 (Errata vs REC track process): Do we need separate Errata and REC Track Processes? [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 7 February 2015

RE: w3process-ISSUE-155 (Errata Access in RECs): Errata access from TR page [Process Document] Stephen Zilles
Re: w3process-ISSUE-155 (Errata Access in RECs): Errata access from TR page [Process Document] Jeff Jaffe
w3process-ISSUE-155 (Errata Access in RECs): Errata access from TR page [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 4 February 2015

Tuesday, 3 February 2015

Monday, 2 February 2015

Sunday, 1 February 2015

Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] chaals@yandex-team.ru

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2015 23:59:10 UTC