- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:41:23 -0800
- To: chaals@yandex-team.ru
- Cc: "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <michael.champion@microsoft.com>, Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
- Message-id: <897DCFFB-CFE5-40C7-941D-7DD5B04FB462@apple.com>
> On Jan 31, 2015, at 18:24 , chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote: > > 30.01.2015, 22:45, "Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)" <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>: >>> Does there need to be a default channel? >> >> What problem does the default channel cause that would be worth even a tiny amount of effort to fix? > > Someone might ask why there is a default channel that isn't respected in practice. Or why W3C doesn't follow it's own process - and someone might waste time trying to justify what happens. > > The tiny amount of effort required is in fact smaller than explaining it, so we have now expanded the necessary work. I’m lost. When I do a review, there is an option at the top, which seems to have a different default than the one you say, but maybe that’s a bug: I agree that we should normally conduct our business member-visible, so I think the form is right in this default. Is that the question, that we should align the process and practice? > > cheers > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] >> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:23 AM >> To: public-w3process@w3.org >> Subject: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] >> >> w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] >> >> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/154 >> >> Raised by: Charles McCathie Nevile >> On product: Process Document >> >> This should be a tiny issue, so I hope we can resolve it in passing. >> >> In section 8.1.1 on AC reviews it says [1] [[[The Team must provide two channels for Advisory Committee review comments: >> >> + an archived Team-only channel; this is the default channel for reviews. >> ]]] >> >> Does there need to be a default channel? >> >> I would suggest not, others have suggested it is helpful - and others have suggested it is helpful if it is to publish it to the world. > > -- > Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex > chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com > David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Attachments
- text/html attachment: stored
- image/png attachment: Screen_Shot_2015-02-02_at_10.39.37_.png
Received on Monday, 2 February 2015 18:42:10 UTC