RESOLUTION: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154

This reports the results of the call for consensus to resolve Issue-154, Should there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews?
  http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/154


Despite the fact that there were relatively few responses, the Call for Consensus produced no objections and one "can live with". I, therefore, declare RESOLUTION on the following text. (Note that the only changes to the section below are the removal of the last clause of list item 1 and the addition of the paragraph following list item 2.)

=====Text========
8.1.1 Start of a Review Period

Each Advisory Committee review period begins with a Call for Review from the Team to the Advisory Committee. The review form describes the proposal, raises attention to deadlines, estimates when the decision will be available, and includes other practical information. Each Member organization MAY send one review, which MUST be returned by its Advisory Committee representative.

The Team MUST provide two channels for Advisory Committee review comments:

  1.  an archived Team-only<http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#Team-only> channel.
  2.  an archived Member-only<http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#Member-only> channel.

The Call for Review MUST specify which channel is the default for review comments on that Call.

Reviewers MAY send information to either or both channels. They MAY also share their reviews with other Members on the Advisory Committee discussion list<http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#ACCommunication>.

======End of Text==========
Steve Zilles
Chair, Process Document Task Force