- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:37:48 +0100 (BST)
- To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, public-vision-newstd@w3.org
> Le mardi 22 juin 2010 à 14:12 -0500, Ian Jacobs a écrit : >> Given discussion last week and comments since then, I've created a >> simpler survey: >> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/newstd2/?login >> >> Please let me know whether you think this would be useful for >> gathering information that will help us create useful proposals. > > I think the set of data that it intends to capture is reasonable, but I > still don't think a formal survey is the right way to gather the data. > > In other words, I think that what we should do is to distribute action > items to gather the said data for the various use cases we've > identified; the gathering of some of this data may require asking > information from some people, but that's much more likely better done on > an ad-hoc basis, adapted to each and everyone communication preferences, > rather than through a one-size-fits all survey. I agree with gathering said data via use-cases (that's what the Social Web XG is trying to do) but let's also use this survey, as I think it covers the bases and I often find survey results surprising. Next step might be to think of where to send it, i.e. both within and without w3c. > > Some nits on the survey, should it be still used as-is: > * "no F2F", "no teleconf" can hardly be called an offering However, some "standardization" communities like the microformat community prefer this, considering teleconfs too time-consuming and f2fs too expensive. So maybe not an "offering" but an option. > * W3C doesn't have a microblog system at this time, so it's not > something that can be evaluated as part of the current infrastructure; > nor is it clear that we offer calendar feeds as a regular service > * instead of "cvs (or...)" I would say "version control system (e.g. > cvs, mercurial)" > > Dom > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 10:37:49 UTC