- From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:03:48 +0200
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Cc: public-vision-newstd@w3.org
On Jun 23, 2010, at 12:37 , Harry Halpin wrote: > Next step might be to think of where to send it, i.e. both within and > without w3c. I reckon we could ask for some help from the State of the Web folks: http://www.webdirections.org/sotw10/ >> Some nits on the survey, should it be still used as-is: >> * "no F2F", "no teleconf" can hardly be called an offering > > However, some "standardization" communities like the microformat community > prefer this, considering teleconfs too time-consuming and f2fs too > expensive. So maybe not an "offering" but an option. I think it's still an offering if you get to have the excellent mailing list support (assuming lists could be administered somehow by non-team) and all the rest of the tooling. -- Robin Berjon robineko — hired gun, higher standards http://robineko.com/
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 13:04:19 UTC