W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Batch closing of issues (ISSUE-144, ISSUE-187, ISSUE-190, ISSUE-173, ISSUE-138) [pls Respond by Jan 30]

From: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:57:46 -0800
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Cc: Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F49E9E79509D4D73B4A45FD846E51FF8@gmail.com>
Do we have a consensus in favor of the new approach to exceptions?  It's been discussed a lot, but as I recall, some members of the group have reservations.  


On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 at 3:23 AM, David Singer wrote:

> If we close these, I suggest that those that are mentioned in the text get their mentions removed, specifically:
>  
> On Jan 21, 2013, at 14:07 , Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org (mailto:mts-std@schunter.org)> wrote:
>  
> > --------------------------------
> > ISSUE-144: User-granted Exceptions: Constraints on user agent behavior while granting and for future requests?
> > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/144
> >  
> > IMHO, the new approach to exceptions has removed the requirements on the user agent.
> > As a consequence, I believe we can close this issue.
> > ----------------------------------
> > ISSUE-190: Sites with multiple first parties
> > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/190
> >  
> > Roy has proposed changes as response to ACTION-328 and (unless there are objections), I suggest to implement the changes suggested:
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Nov/0004.html
> >  
>  
>  
>  
> please let the editors know when to clean these two references from the document…
>  
> David Singer
> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>  
>  
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 16:58:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:39:18 UTC