Re: Batch closing of issues (ISSUE-144, ISSUE-187, ISSUE-190, ISSUE-173, ISSUE-138) [pls Respond by Jan 30]

If we close these, I suggest that those that are mentioned in the text get their mentions removed, specifically:

On Jan 21, 2013, at 14:07 , Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org> wrote:

> --------------------------------
> ISSUE-144: User-granted Exceptions: Constraints on user agent behavior while granting and for future requests?
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/144
> 
> IMHO, the new approach to exceptions has removed the requirements on the user agent.
> As a consequence, I believe we can close this issue.
> ----------------------------------
> ISSUE-190: Sites with multiple first parties
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/190
> 
> Roy has proposed changes as response to ACTION-328 and (unless there are objections), I suggest to implement the changes suggested:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Nov/0004.html
> 


please let the editors know when to clean these two references from the document…

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 11:23:46 UTC