Re: Batch closing of issues (ISSUE-144, ISSUE-187, ISSUE-190, ISSUE-173, ISSUE-138) [pls Respond by Jan 30]

Hi Jonathan,

I believe that we agree to focus on this new approach:
- Many participants expressed preference for the new approach (while 
saying that some fine-tuning is still required)
- All participants "can live with" this new approach

 From a privacy perspective, IMHO it is beneficial that user agents can 
validate exceptions
with the actual user and can keep an (editable) database of all granted 
exceptions. Also - due to the fact that less
requirements are imposed on the UA - I believe that UAs can compete and 
differentiate more effectively with this new approach.



On 22/01/2013 17:57, Jonathan Mayer wrote:
> Do we have a consensus in favor of the new approach to exceptions? 
>  It's been discussed a lot, but as I recall, some members of the group 
> have reservations.
> On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 at 3:23 AM, David Singer wrote:
>> If we close these, I suggest that those that are mentioned in the 
>> text get their mentions removed, specifically:
>> On Jan 21, 2013, at 14:07 , Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) 
>> < <>> wrote:
>>> --------------------------------
>>> ISSUE-144: User-granted Exceptions: Constraints on user agent 
>>> behavior while granting and for future requests?
>>> IMHO, the new approach to exceptions has removed the requirements on 
>>> the user agent.
>>> As a consequence, I believe we can close this issue.
>>> ----------------------------------
>>> ISSUE-190: Sites with multiple first parties
>>> Roy has proposed changes as response to ACTION-328 and (unless there 
>>> are objections), I suggest to implement the changes suggested:
>> please let the editors know when to clean these two references from 
>> the document…
>> David Singer
>> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 19:34:13 UTC