Batch closing of issues (ISSUE-144, ISSUE-187, ISSUE-190, ISSUE-173, ISSUE-138) [pls Respond by Jan 30]

Hi Team,

I suggest to batch-close the issues listed below that have been marked 
PENDING REVIEW for a while.
If you disagree with my proposal to close any of those issues, please 
respond by Wednesday, Jan 30.

Regards,
  matthias
--------------------------------
ISSUE-138: Web-Wide Exception Well Known URI
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/138

The issue was how to obtain exceptions without Javascript-able 
real-estate. Our discussions are reflected in Section 6.8 of the current 
spec and (unless someone objects), I plan to close ISSUE-138.
--------------------------------
ISSUE-144: User-granted Exceptions: Constraints on user agent behavior 
while granting and for future requests?
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/144

IMHO, the new approach to exceptions has removed the requirements on the 
user agent.
As a consequence, I believe we can close this issue.
--------------------------------
ISSUE-187: What is the right approach to exception handling?
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/187

During the last call, I validated that there is a general preference for 
pursuing our rivised approach to exceptions (where the sites records 
preference and the UA may double-check it with the user). All 
participants can live with this approach.
I suggest to close ISSUE-187.
----------------------------------
ISSUE-190: Sites with multiple first parties
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/190

Roy has proposed changes as response to ACTION-328 and (unless there are 
objections), I suggest to implement the changes suggested:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Nov/0004.html

-----------------------------------
ISSUE-173: The TPE uses "top-level domain" in a sense that is not the 
normal meaning
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/173

AFAIK, David Singer has introduced the corresponding bug fixes to the 
spec. This ISSUE has thus been resolved and can be closed.

Received on Monday, 21 January 2013 13:07:56 UTC