- From: David Wainberg <david@networkadvertising.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:27:01 -0500
- To: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
- CC: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Hi Matthias, On 1/21/13 2:56 PM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: > ISSUE-153: What are the implications on software that changes requests > but does not necessarily initiate them? > https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/153 > Proposed text (by david and nick): "Software outside of the user > agent that causes a DNT header to be sent (or modifies existing > headers) MUST NOT > do so without following the requirements of this section; such > software is responsible for assuring the expressed preference reflects > the user's intent." I have pointed out previously (multiple times) that there are proposed alternatives to this language. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Dec/0030.html Is there something else I need to do to ensure those alternatives stay with this issue? -David
Received on Monday, 21 January 2013 22:27:28 UTC