Re: Agenda for 21 December 2012 TPE call - V02

I added a note to the issue which links to your proposed text.
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler)



On 2013-01-21, at 23:27 +0100, David Wainberg <david@networkadvertising.org> wrote:

> Hi Matthias,
> 
> On 1/21/13 2:56 PM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
>> ISSUE-153: What are the implications on software that changes requests but does not necessarily initiate them?
>> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/153
>>      Proposed text (by david and nick): "Software outside of the user agent that causes a DNT header to be sent (or modifies existing headers) MUST NOT
>>   do so without following the requirements of this section; such software is responsible for assuring the expressed preference reflects the user's intent." 
> 
> I have pointed out previously (multiple times) that there are proposed alternatives to this language. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Dec/0030.html
> 
> Is there something else I need to do to ensure those alternatives stay with this issue?
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 11:48:14 UTC