- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:48:08 +0100
- To: David Wainberg <david@networkadvertising.org>
- Cc: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
I added a note to the issue which links to your proposed text. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) On 2013-01-21, at 23:27 +0100, David Wainberg <david@networkadvertising.org> wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > On 1/21/13 2:56 PM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: >> ISSUE-153: What are the implications on software that changes requests but does not necessarily initiate them? >> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/153 >> Proposed text (by david and nick): "Software outside of the user agent that causes a DNT header to be sent (or modifies existing headers) MUST NOT >> do so without following the requirements of this section; such software is responsible for assuring the expressed preference reflects the user's intent." > > I have pointed out previously (multiple times) that there are proposed alternatives to this language. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Dec/0030.html > > Is there something else I need to do to ensure those alternatives stay with this issue? > > -David > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 11:48:14 UTC