W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > January 2013

Agenda for 21 December 2012 TPE call - V02

From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:56:30 +0100
Message-ID: <50FD9D6E.8070807@schunter.org>
To: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Hi Team,

V02: Added offline caller ID policy

Regards,
matthias

---------------------------
Administrative
---------------------------

1. Selection of scribe

---------------------------
Old business
---------------------------

2. Review of overdue action items: 
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/actions/overdue?sort=owne 
<http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/actions/overdue?sort=owner>

3.Offline-caller-identification:
If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your 
phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call 
(command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in my 
case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead oftime. If you are not 
comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone number, 
please email your name and phone number tonpdoty@w3.orgby 8am PT 
tomorrow. We want to reduce (in fact, eliminate) the time spent on the 
call identifying phone numbers. Note that if your number is not 
identified and you do not respond to off-the-phone reminders via IRC, 
you will be dropped from the call.


---------------------------
4. ISSUES marked OPEN
---------------------------
Goal: review open issues at 
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/products/2
and assign actions to them

ISSUE-153: What are the implications on software that changes requests 
but does not necessarily initiate them?
https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/153
       Proposed text (by david and nick): "Software outside of the user 
agent that causes a DNT header to be sent (or modifies existing headers) 
MUST NOT
    do so without following the requirements of this section; such 
software is responsible for assuring the expressed preference reflects 
the user's intent."

ISSUE-144: User-granted Exceptions: Constraints on user agent behavior 
while granting and for future requests?
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/144
- Discussions:
     - Do we need any constraints on user agent behavior?
     - If yes:
        - What specific constraints should we specify for user-granted 
exceptions
- Related discussions (probably not during call but rather at the F2F):
        - How can we "police" user agents?
        - How to handle "non-compliant" user agents?

ISSUE-137: Does hybrid tracking status need to distinguish between first 
party (1) and outsourcing service provider acting as a first party (s)
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/137
- Roy (ACTION-354) plans to provide input on ISSUE-137.

---------------------------
5. ISSUES marked PENDING REVIEW
---------------------------

I have sent an email for batch closing of some ISSUES to the list.
Please review and respond as needed.

---------------------------

6. Announce next meeting & adjourn

================ Infrastructure =================

Zakim teleconference bridge:
VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org
Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225)
IRC Chat: irc.w3.org <http://irc.w3.org/>, port 6665, #dnt

*****
Received on Monday, 21 January 2013 19:56:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:39:18 UTC