public-tracking@w3.org from September 2011 by thread

Agenda for 2011-09-28 TPWG call Aleecia M. McDonald (Monday, 26 September)

Facebook tracking Karl Dubost (Sunday, 25 September)

tracking-ISSUE-88: different rules for impression of and interaction with 3rd-party ads/content [Tracking Preference Expression Definitions and Compliance] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 23 September)

Re: ISSUE-23 and ISSUE-34 (exemption for analytics and exemption for aggregate analytics) Peter Eckersley (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-87: Should there be an option for the server to respond with "I don't know what my policy is" Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-86: Do we have general extensibility capability for header response? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-85: DOM property and its access generally and specifically to web apps Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-84: Do we need a JavaScript API / DOM property for client-side js access to Do Not Track status? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-83: How do you opt out if already opted in? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-82: Should the DNT header be extensible with additional parameters? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-80: Instead of responding with a Link: header URI, does it make sense to use a well-known location for this policy? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-79: Should a server respond if a user sent DNT:0? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-78: What is the difference between absence of DNT header and DNT = 0? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-77: How does a website determine if a first or third party and should this be included in the protocol? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-76: Should a server echo the DNT header to confirm receipt? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-75: How co companies claim exemptions and is that technical or not? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-74: Are surveys out of scope? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-73: In order for analytics or other contracting to count as first-party: by contract, by technical silo, both silo and contract Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-72: Basic principle: independent use as an agent of a first party Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-71: Does DNT also affect past collection or use of past collection of info? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-70: Does a past HTTP request with DNT set affect future HTTP requests? (expiration) Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-69: Should the spec say anything about minimal notice? (ie. don't bury in a privacy policy) Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-68: Should there be functionality for syncing preferences about tracking across different browsers? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-67: Should opt-back-in be stored on the client side? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-66: Can user be allowed to consent to both third party and first party to override general DNT? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-65: How does logged in and logged out state work Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-64: How does preference management work with DNT Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-63: Should there be a popup dialog or something like that which should override DNT? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-62: The browser or embedding site could send an architectural signal to an embedded iframe so it knows it's in a 3rd-party context Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-61: A site could publish a list of the other domains that are associated with them Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-60: Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about whether the user has sent a DNT header to third parties on their site? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-58: What if DNT is explicitly set to 0 and an opt-out cookie is present? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-57: What if an opt-out cookie exists but an "opt back in" out-of-band is present? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-56: What if DNT is unspecified and an opt-out cookie is present? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-55: What is relationship between behavioral advertising and tracking, subset, different items? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-54: Can first party provide targeting based on registration information even while sending DNT Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-53: How should opt-out cookie and DNT signal interact? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-52: What if conflict between opt-out cookie and DNT? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-51: Should 1st party have any response to DNT signal Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-50: Are DNT headers sent to first parties? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

More details for tomorrow AM Matthias Schunter (Thursday, 22 September)

ISSUE-49: Third party as first party - is a third party that collects data on behalf of the first party treated the same way as the first party? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 22 September)

updated agenda for tomorrow Aleecia M. McDonald (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-48: Response from the server could both acknowledge receipt of a value and (separately) whether the server will honor it Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-47: Should the response from the server point to a URI of a policy (or an existing protocol) rather than a single bit in the protocol? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-46: Enable users to do more granular blocking based on whether the site responds honoring Do Not Track Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-45: Companies making public commitments with a "regulatory hook" for US legal purposes Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-44: Ability to measure/detect who is honoring Do Not Track at a technical level Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-43: Sites should be able to let the user know their options when they arrive with Do Not Track Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-42: Feedback to the user from the browser when Do Not Track is turned on Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-41: Consistent way to discuss tracking with users (terminology matters!) Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-40: Enable Do Not Track just for a session, rather than being stored Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-39: Tracking of geographic data (however it's determined, or used) Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-38: Granularity for different people who share a device or browser Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-37: Granularity could be as complex as something P3P-style, based on business types and uses Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-36: Should DNT opt-outs distinguish between behavioral targeting and other personalization? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-35: How will DNT interact with existing opt-out programs (industry self-reg, other)? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-34: Possible exemption for aggregate analytics Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-33: Complexity of user choice (are exemptions exposed to users?) Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-32: Sharing of data between entities via cookie syncing / identity brokering Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-31: Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (conditional exemptions) Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-30: Will Do Not Track apply to offline aggregating or selling of data? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-29: Tracking that may be required by law enforcement Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-28: Exception for mandatory legal process Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-27: Mechanism to revoke Do Not Track for specific entities (maybe I really like Google), "opt back in" Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-26: Providing data to 3rd-party widgets -- does that imply consent? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-25: Possible exemption for research purposes Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-24: Possible exemption for fraud detection and defense Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-23: Possible exemption for analytics Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-22: Still have "operational use" of data (auditing of where ads are shown, impression tracking, etc.) Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-21: Enable external audit of DNT compliance Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-20: Different types of data, what counts as PII, and what definition of PII Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-19: Data collection / Data use (3rd party) Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-18: Collection definition (not sure I said the prefix before?) Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-17: Data use by 1st Party Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-16: What does it mean to collect data? (caching, logging, storage, retention, accumulation, profile etc.) Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-15: What special treatment should there be for children's data? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-14: How does what we talk about with 1st/3rd party relate to European law about data collector vs data processor? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-13: What are the requirements for DNT on apps/native software in addition to browsers? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-12: How does tracking require relation to unique identities, pseudonyms, etc.? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-11: Document a longer list of use cases -- what's going on today Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-10: What is a first party? As an example, CBS and C|Net are the same company but visually distinct websites/brand, is this a first party relationship? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-9: Understand all the different first- and third-party cases. Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-8: How do we enhance transparency and consumer awareness? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-7: What types of tracking exists, and what are the use cases for these types of tracking? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-6: What are the underlying concerns? Why are we doing this / what are people afraid of? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-5: What is the definition of tracking? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-4: What is the default? Is this an opt-in or an opt-out? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-3: What is the granularity of the choice we expect users to make? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-2: What is the meaning of DNT (Do Not Track) header? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

ISSUE-1: Example issue to be closed, so people can see what an issue looks like. Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 21 September)

f2f for remote attendees Nicholas Doty (Wednesday, 21 September)

Welcome to Matthias, co-chair Aleecia M. McDonald (Wednesday, 21 September)

URL Filter List file format Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 20 September)

Opera URL Filter API Karl Dubost (Tuesday, 20 September)

Comments on Web Tracking Protection W3C Member Submission 24 February 2011 Karl Dubost (Monday, 19 September)

[Minutes] Tracking Protection WG Teleconference 14 & 16 September 2011 Karl Dubost (Monday, 19 September)

[proposal] Template for communicating our issues Karl Dubost (Saturday, 17 September)

Further input document suggestions Hodges, Jeff (Friday, 16 September)

A few input document suggestions Jonathan Mayer (Thursday, 15 September)

1st Tracking Protection WG F2F - Cambridge, USA - 21-22 September 2011 Karl Dubost (Thursday, 15 September)

Overflow call: 16 September at 8 am Pacific / 11 am Eastern / 17:00 Central European Aleecia M. McDonald (Wednesday, 14 September)

quick test, ignore Thomas Roessler (Tuesday, 13 September)

Conference call invitation: 14 September at 8 am Pacific / 11 am Eastern / 17:00 Central European Aleecia M. McDonald (Tuesday, 13 September)

Welcome to the mailing list Aleecia M. McDonald (Tuesday, 13 September)

Last message date: Friday, 30 September 2011 01:48:02 UTC