- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:15:20 +0100
- To: "David Singer" <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:50:02 +0100, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > > On Jan 27, 2012, at 3:56 , Simon Pieters wrote: > >> "A WebVTT file whose cues all have an end time offset x greater than or >> equal to the end time offsets of all the cues whose start time offsets >> are less than x is said to be a WebVTT file using only nested cues." >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/webvtt/#webvtt-file-using-only-nested-cues >> >> I have two problems with this definition. First, it takes considerable >> mental focus to understand what it means (at least for me). It would be >> nice if it could be explained more clearly, and/or give examples that >> match the definition and examples that don't. >> >> Secondly, the name implies that all cues must be nested, since the file >> is said to be using "only" nested cues, but this is not the case, so >> maybe the definition should have a more accurate name. I was >> considering "WebVTT file with no overlapping cues", but that's not >> accurate either if nested cues are also overlapping. > > > I agree, but I wonder what the definition is for, since it isn't used > elsewhere? "Furthermore, if the element's track URL identifies a WebVTT resource, and the element's kind attribute is in the chapters state, then the WebVTT file must be both a WebVTT file using chapter title text and a WebVTT file using only nested cues. [WEBVTT]" http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-video-element.html#the-track-element > We might also have a definition of a non-overlapping VTT file (which > maybe is obvious)… > > David Singer > Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 06:15:52 UTC