[svg-aam] Implementation role mapping for SVG elements (#52)
Re: [svg-aam] SVG-AAM should address which elements should map to ARIA `generic` role (#21)
Re: [svgwg] Testing HTML/CSS <-> SVG interoperability (#1015)
Re: [svgwg] Publish current status of SVG (#938)
[svgwg] Issue: `SVGPathSegment` should be a dictionary, not a `[NoInterfaceObject]` interface (#1082) marked as Agenda+
[svgwg] `SVGPathSegment` should be a dictionary, not a `[NoInterfaceObject]` interface (#1082)
Re: [svgwg] New Interface SVGPathSegment: segments should be more editable (#974)
[svgwg] Issue: New Interface SVGPathSegment: segments should be more editable (#974) marked as Agenda+
[svgwg] css shape() in path's 'd' property (#1081)
[svgwg] What are the allowed values for stop-color ? (#1080)
[svgwg] Issue: Publish current status of SVG (#938) marked as Agenda+
[svg-aam] Kicking off SVG-AAM work (#51)
[svg-aam] svg-aam: remove mappings for SVG elements removed between SVG2 2016 CR and SVG2 2018 CR (#50)
[svgwg] Pull Request: Update from api.csswg.org/bikeshed to spec-generator
[svgwg] Pull Request: FIX #1018 getbbox returns 0,0,0,0 when values are invalid or absent.
[svgwg] Pull Request: Update <textPath> `path`/`href` fallback behavior per WG resolution
Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876)
- Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876)
- Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876)
- Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876)
- Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876)
- Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876)
- Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876)
- Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876)
- Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876)
Re: [svgwg] Should getBBox returns values when the shape can't be drawn (#1018)
- Re: [svgwg] Should getBBox returns values when the shape can't be drawn (#1018)
- Re: [svgwg] Should getBBox returns values when the shape can't be drawn (#1018)
- Re: [svgwg] Should getBBox returns values when the shape can't be drawn (#1018)
- Re: [svgwg] Should getBBox returns values when the shape can't be drawn (#1018)
- Re: [svgwg] Should getBBox returns values when the shape can't be drawn (#1018)
[svg-aam] Some links go to the wrong place (#49)
Re: [svgwg] Building a schema for SVG / Creating an SVG profile for IEC 61850-6-2 (#699)
[svgwg] Issue: Building a schema for SVG / Creating an SVG profile for IEC 61850-6-2 (#699) marked as Agenda+
Re: [svgwg] Multi-Page support (#157)
[svgwg] Issue: Multi-Page support (#157) marked as Agenda+
Re: [svgwg] Fix TOC styling in Editor's Drafts for specs on svgwg.org (#194)
Closed: [svgwg] Fix TOC styling in Editor's Drafts for specs on svgwg.org (#194)
Re: [svgwg] Remove or add warnings to outdated draft specs on dev.w3.org (#188)
Closed: [svgwg] Remove or add warnings to outdated draft specs on dev.w3.org (#188)
Re: [svgwg] Triage all issues from Tracker (#250)
Closed: [svgwg] Triage all issues from Tracker (#250)
Closed: [svgwg] SVGWG Agenda TPAC 2019 (#731)
Re: [svgwg] SVGWG Agenda TPAC 2019 (#731)
Re: [svgwg] Mixed content issue when viewing GitHub-hosted spec over HTTPS (#283)
Closed: [svgwg] Mixed content issue when viewing GitHub-hosted spec over HTTPS (#283)
Re: [svgwg] Corner-case incompleteness of stroke-miterlimit specification for "arcs" join (#772)
Closed: [svgwg] Corner-case incompleteness of stroke-miterlimit specification for "arcs" join (#772)
Re: [svgwg] Alternative arcs join fallback heuristics (SVG 2 sec 13.5.7,9) (#771)
Closed: [svgwg] Alternative arcs join fallback heuristics (SVG 2 sec 13.5.7,9) (#771)
Re: [svgwg] SVG 2 spec section 13.5.7 (probably) incorrect for miter-clip (and arcs?) (#745)
Closed: [svgwg] SVG 2 spec section 13.5.7 (probably) incorrect for miter-clip (and arcs?) (#745)
[svg-aam] Graphics AAM links broken (#48)
[svgwg] Issue: Overflow property behavior / spec on SVG element doesn't match reality. (#1072) marked as Agenda+
Closed: [svgwg] Remove stroke-linejoin 'miter-clip' or 'arcs' #592 (#1065)
[svg-aam] What does 'valid' mean in 'link role if the element has a valid href or xlink:href attribute' (#47)
- Re: [svg-aam] What does 'valid' mean in 'link role if the element has a valid href or xlink:href attribute' (#47)
- Re: [svg-aam] What does 'valid' mean in 'link role if the element has a valid href or xlink:href attribute' (#47)
- Re: [svg-aam] What does 'valid' mean in 'link role if the element has a valid href or xlink:href attribute' (#47)
- Re: [svg-aam] What does 'valid' mean in 'link role if the element has a valid href or xlink:href attribute' (#47)
[svgwg] Pull Request: Remove SVGElementInstance mixin interface - Fix #1070
[svgwg] Issue: `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075) marked as SVG21
[svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075)
- Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075)
- Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075)
- Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075)
- Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075)
- Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075)
- Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075)
- Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075)
- Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075)
- Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075)
Re: [svgwg] Implementing CSS Text Wrapping in SVG (#942)
[svgwg] Pull Request: Fix #1065 - Remove stroke-linejoin 'miter-clip' or 'arcs'
- Re: [svgwg] Fix #1065 - Remove stroke-linejoin 'miter-clip' or 'arcs' (#1074)
- Re: [svgwg] Fix #1065 - Remove stroke-linejoin 'miter-clip' or 'arcs' (#1074)
- [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: Fix #1065 - Remove stroke-linejoin 'miter-clip' or 'arcs'
[svg-aam] Issue: allowed roles for a (#46) marked as question
[svg-aam] allowed roles for a (#46)
Re: [svgwg] Remove stroke-linejoin 'miter-clip' or 'arcs' #592 (#1065)
[svgwg] Pull Request: Add path-length CSS property definition (Section 9.6.1)
[svgwg] Issue: Support pathLength via CSS (#773) marked as Agenda+
[svgwg] Overflow property behavior / spec on SVG element doesn't match reality. (#1072)
- Re: [svgwg] Overflow property behavior / spec on SVG element doesn't match reality. (#1072)
- Re: [svgwg] Overflow property behavior / spec on SVG element doesn't match reality. (#1072)
- Re: [svgwg] Overflow property behavior / spec on SVG element doesn't match reality. (#1072)
- Re: [svgwg] Overflow property behavior / spec on SVG element doesn't match reality. (#1072)
Closed: [svgwg] SVG path animation: unclear behavior for from + by when commands mismatch (#1056)
[svgwg] Pull Request: #fix 828 - Drop display properties from UA svg CSS.
[svgwg] Issue: Remove correspondingElement and correspondingUseElement from SVGElement (#1070) marked as Agenda+
[svgwg] Remove correspondingElement and correspondingUseElement from SVGElement (#1070)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove correspondingElement and correspondingUseElement from SVGElement (#1070)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove/Better testing correspondingElement and correspondingUseElement from SVGElement (#1070)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove/Better testing correspondingElement and correspondingUseElement from SVGElement (#1070)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove/Better testing correspondingElement and correspondingUseElement from SVGElement (#1070)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove SVGElementInstance (correspondingElement / correspondingUseElement) (#1070)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove SVGElementInstance (correspondingElement / correspondingUseElement) (#1070)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove SVGElementInstance (correspondingElement / correspondingUseElement) (#1070)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove SVGElementInstance (correspondingElement / correspondingUseElement) (#1070)
Re: [svgwg] WPT tests failing everywhere (#1064)
[svgwg] Merged Pull Request: Clarify path d animation mismatch handling for from/by and additive animations
[svgwg] CSS (#1069)
Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828)
- Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828)
- Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828)
- Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828)
- Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828)
- Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828)
- Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828)
[svgwg] Issue: UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828) marked as Agenda+
[svgwg] Issue: Does the entire path need to be valid in order to use a path attribute on a textPath (#393) marked as Agenda+
[svgwg] Issue: SVGTextPathElement interface seems to be missing properties (#391) marked as SVG21
[svgwg] Issue: Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068) marked as Agenda+
[svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068)
[svgwg] Issue: Remove shape-inside and shape-substract from SVG2 (#1067) marked as Agenda+
[svgwg] Remove shape-inside and shape-substract from SVG2 (#1067)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove shape-inside and shape-substract from SVG2 (#1067)
- Re: [svgwg] Remove shape-inside and shape-substract from SVG2 (#1067)
Re: [svgwg] Clarify path d animation mismatch handling for from/by and additive animations (#1062)
Re: [svgwg] SVG path animation: unclear behavior for from + by when commands mismatch (#1056)
Re: [svgwg] Does the entire path need to be valid in order to use a path attribute on a textPath (#393)
- Re: [svgwg] Does the entire path need to be valid in order to use a path attribute on a textPath (#393)
- Re: [svgwg] Does the entire path need to be valid in order to use a path attribute on a textPath (#393)
- Re: [svgwg] Does the entire path need to be valid in order to use a path attribute on a textPath (#393)