public-svg-issues@w3.org from March 2026 by author

caribouW3 via GitHub

• [svgwg] Issue: Publish current status of SVG (#938) marked as Agenda+ (Friday, 20 March)

Cynthia Shelly via GitHub

• [svg-aam] Kicking off SVG-AAM work (#51) (Friday, 20 March)
• [svg-aam] Graphics AAM links broken (#48) (Wednesday, 18 March)

Daniel Montalvo via GitHub

• Closed: [svg-aam] Graphics AAM links broken (#48) (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: [svg-aam] Some links go to the wrong place (#49) (Thursday, 19 March)

Dirk Schulze via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] New Interface SVGPathSegment: segments should be more editable (#974) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [svgwg] `SVGPathSegment` should be a dictionary, not a `[NoInterfaceObject]` interface (#1082) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Publish current status of SVG (#938) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Multi-Page support (#157) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Support pathLength via CSS (#773) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Overflow property behavior / spec on SVG element doesn't match reality. (#1072) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Does the entire path need to be valid in order to use a path attribute on a textPath (#393) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove stroke-linejoin 'miter-clip' or 'arcs' #592 (#1065) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove shape-inside and shape-substract from SVG2 (#1067) (Wednesday, 11 March)

Divyansh Mangal via GitHub

• [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: #fix 828 - Drop display properties from UA svg CSS. (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828) (Thursday, 5 March)

Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Overflow property behavior / spec on SVG element doesn't match reality. (#1072) (Saturday, 7 March)
• [svgwg] Overflow property behavior / spec on SVG element doesn't match reality. (#1072) (Saturday, 7 March)

Frederik Braun via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876) (Wednesday, 18 March)

herrstrietzel via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075) (Saturday, 21 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Implementing CSS Text Wrapping in SVG (#942) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068) (Thursday, 12 March)

jdaw1 via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075) (Saturday, 21 March)
• Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075) (Monday, 16 March)

Karl Dubost via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Testing HTML/CSS <-> SVG interoperability (#1015) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Multi-Page support (#157) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Should getBBox returns values when the shape can't be drawn (#1018) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] FIX #1018 getbbox returns 0,0,0,0 when values are invalid or absent. (#1078) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove SVGElementInstance (correspondingElement / correspondingUseElement) (#1070) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Overflow property behavior / spec on SVG element doesn't match reality. (#1072) (Thursday, 19 March)
• [svgwg] Pull Request: FIX #1018 getbbox returns 0,0,0,0 when values are invalid or absent. (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Should getBBox returns values when the shape can't be drawn (#1018) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Should getBBox returns values when the shape can't be drawn (#1018) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Should getBBox returns values when the shape can't be drawn (#1018) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Should getBBox returns values when the shape can't be drawn (#1018) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Should getBBox returns values when the shape can't be drawn (#1018) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Building a schema for SVG / Creating an SVG profile for IEC 61850-6-2 (#699) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [svgwg] Issue: Building a schema for SVG / Creating an SVG profile for IEC 61850-6-2 (#699) marked as Agenda+ (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Multi-Page support (#157) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [svgwg] Issue: Multi-Page support (#157) marked as Agenda+ (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Fix TOC styling in Editor's Drafts for specs on svgwg.org (#194) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Closed: [svgwg] Fix TOC styling in Editor's Drafts for specs on svgwg.org (#194) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove or add warnings to outdated draft specs on dev.w3.org (#188) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Closed: [svgwg] Remove or add warnings to outdated draft specs on dev.w3.org (#188) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Triage all issues from Tracker (#250) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Closed: [svgwg] Triage all issues from Tracker (#250) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Closed: [svgwg] SVGWG Agenda TPAC 2019 (#731) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] SVGWG Agenda TPAC 2019 (#731) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Mixed content issue when viewing GitHub-hosted spec over HTTPS (#283) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Closed: [svgwg] Mixed content issue when viewing GitHub-hosted spec over HTTPS (#283) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Corner-case incompleteness of stroke-miterlimit specification for "arcs" join (#772) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Closed: [svgwg] Corner-case incompleteness of stroke-miterlimit specification for "arcs" join (#772) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Alternative arcs join fallback heuristics (SVG 2 sec 13.5.7,9) (#771) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Closed: [svgwg] Alternative arcs join fallback heuristics (SVG 2 sec 13.5.7,9) (#771) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] SVG 2 spec section 13.5.7 (probably) incorrect for miter-clip (and arcs?) (#745) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Closed: [svgwg] SVG 2 spec section 13.5.7 (probably) incorrect for miter-clip (and arcs?) (#745) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Overflow property behavior / spec on SVG element doesn't match reality. (#1072) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [svgwg] Issue: Overflow property behavior / spec on SVG element doesn't match reality. (#1072) marked as Agenda+ (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Closed: [svgwg] Remove stroke-linejoin 'miter-clip' or 'arcs' #592 (#1065) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: Fix #1065 - Remove stroke-linejoin 'miter-clip' or 'arcs' (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Fix #1065 - Remove stroke-linejoin 'miter-clip' or 'arcs' (#1074) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove SVGElementInstance (correspondingElement / correspondingUseElement) (#1070) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [svgwg] Pull Request: Remove SVGElementInstance mixin interface - Fix #1070 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove SVGElementInstance (correspondingElement / correspondingUseElement) (#1070) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove SVGElementInstance (correspondingElement / correspondingUseElement) (#1070) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove/Better testing correspondingElement and correspondingUseElement from SVGElement (#1070) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove/Better testing correspondingElement and correspondingUseElement from SVGElement (#1070) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove/Better testing correspondingElement and correspondingUseElement from SVGElement (#1070) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [svgwg] Issue: `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075) marked as SVG21 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Fix #1065 - Remove stroke-linejoin 'miter-clip' or 'arcs' (#1074) (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068) (Thursday, 12 March)
• [svgwg] Pull Request: Fix #1065 - Remove stroke-linejoin 'miter-clip' or 'arcs' (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• [svgwg] Pull Request: #fix 828 - Drop display properties from UA svg CSS. (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Does the entire path need to be valid in order to use a path attribute on a textPath (#393) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove correspondingElement and correspondingUseElement from SVGElement (#1070) (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [svgwg] Issue: Remove correspondingElement and correspondingUseElement from SVGElement (#1070) marked as Agenda+ (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [svgwg] Remove correspondingElement and correspondingUseElement from SVGElement (#1070) (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: [svgwg] WPT tests failing everywhere (#1064) (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: Clarify path d animation mismatch handling for from/by and additive animations (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: [svgwg] UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828) (Tuesday, 3 March)
• [svgwg] Issue: UA stylesheet seems to require title as display: none but browsers do display: inline (#828) marked as Agenda+ (Tuesday, 3 March)
• [svgwg] Issue: SVGTextPathElement interface seems to be missing properties (#391) marked as SVG21 (Tuesday, 3 March)
• [svgwg] Issue: Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068) marked as Agenda+ (Tuesday, 3 March)
• [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068) (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove shape-inside and shape-substract from SVG2 (#1067) (Tuesday, 3 March)
• [svgwg] Issue: Remove shape-inside and shape-substract from SVG2 (#1067) marked as Agenda+ (Tuesday, 3 March)
• [svgwg] Remove shape-inside and shape-substract from SVG2 (#1067) (Tuesday, 3 March)

Kenneth G. Franqueiro via GitHub

• [svgwg] Pull Request: Update from api.csswg.org/bikeshed to spec-generator (Thursday, 19 March)

Mark Rogers via GitHub

• [svg-aam] svg-aam: remove mappings for SVG elements removed between SVG2 2016 CR and SVG2 2018 CR (#50) (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: [svg-aam] What does 'valid' mean in 'link role if the element has a valid href or xlink:href attribute' (#47) (Thursday, 19 March)
• [svg-aam] Some links go to the wrong place (#49) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svg-aam] What does 'valid' mean in 'link role if the element has a valid href or xlink:href attribute' (#47) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• [svg-aam] What does 'valid' mean in 'link role if the element has a valid href or xlink:href attribute' (#47) (Wednesday, 18 March)

Matthias Clasen via GitHub

• [svgwg] What are the allowed values for stop-color ? (#1080) (Friday, 20 March)

moirajeanthompson2020-sketch via GitHub

• Closed: [svgwg] CSS (#1069) (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: [svgwg] CSS (#1069) (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [svgwg] CSS (#1069) (Wednesday, 4 March)

Peter Krautzberger via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] `baseline-y` in SVG (#1075) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svg-aam] What does 'valid' mean in 'link role if the element has a valid href or xlink:href attribute' (#47) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svg-aam] allowed roles for a (#46) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• [svg-aam] Issue: allowed roles for a (#46) marked as question (Wednesday, 11 March)
• [svg-aam] allowed roles for a (#46) (Wednesday, 11 March)

Psychpsyo (Cameron) via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Clarify <iframe> behavior in <svg:use> (#876) (Wednesday, 18 March)

Rob Mayer via GitHub

• [svgwg] css shape() in path's 'd' property (#1081) (Wednesday, 25 March)

Tavmjong via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068) (Wednesday, 11 March)

Valerie Young via GitHub

• Re: [svg-aam] What does 'valid' mean in 'link role if the element has a valid href or xlink:href attribute' (#47) (Thursday, 19 March)

viralipurbey via GitHub

• [svgwg] Issue: `SVGPathSegment` should be a dictionary, not a `[NoInterfaceObject]` interface (#1082) marked as Agenda+ (Thursday, 26 March)
• [svgwg] `SVGPathSegment` should be a dictionary, not a `[NoInterfaceObject]` interface (#1082) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: [svgwg] New Interface SVGPathSegment: segments should be more editable (#974) (Thursday, 26 March)
• [svgwg] Issue: New Interface SVGPathSegment: segments should be more editable (#974) marked as Agenda+ (Thursday, 26 March)
• [svgwg] Pull Request: Update <textPath> `path`/`href` fallback behavior per WG resolution (Thursday, 19 March)
• [svgwg] Pull Request: Add path-length CSS property definition (Section 9.6.1) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• [svgwg] Issue: Support pathLength via CSS (#773) marked as Agenda+ (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: [svgwg] SVG path animation: unclear behavior for from + by when commands mismatch (#1056) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Closed: [svgwg] SVG path animation: unclear behavior for from + by when commands mismatch (#1056) (Thursday, 5 March)
• [svgwg] Issue: Does the entire path need to be valid in order to use a path attribute on a textPath (#393) marked as Agenda+ (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Does the entire path need to be valid in order to use a path attribute on a textPath (#393) (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Clarify path d animation mismatch handling for from/by and additive animations (#1062) (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: [svgwg] SVG path animation: unclear behavior for from + by when commands mismatch (#1056) (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Does the entire path need to be valid in order to use a path attribute on a textPath (#393) (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Support pathLength via CSS (#773) (Monday, 2 March)

W3C Bot via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Update from api.csswg.org/bikeshed to spec-generator (#1079) (Thursday, 19 March)

一丝 via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: [svgwg] Remove "side" attribute from "textPath" (#1068) (Thursday, 5 March)

Last message date: Thursday, 26 March 2026 13:17:42 UTC