W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-socialweb@w3.org > March 2015

Re: Teleconference 2015-03-24 17:00 UTC

From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:30:22 +0100
Message-ID: <550EA7CE.7070206@wwelves.org>
To: public-socialweb@w3.org
On 03/21/2015 07:14 PM, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> All,
> 
> We'll be having our regular weekly phone meeting on Tuesday, 24 March
> 2015 at 17:00 UTC (1PM EST, 10AM PST).
> 
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-03-24
> 
> Please be there!
Thank you Evan!

I see on agenda many AS2.0 issues which we didn't get to during F2F. All
of them have links to relevant ISSUEs & ACTIONs in W3C tracker, which in
turn have various notes and links to relevant wiki pages. Everyone
please try to follow links to tracker and wiki and refresh on the
background of those topics!

I would suggest to at least take a look at those 2 topics this week:

## Collections/Containers

* since we have seen demos of LDP and see it as piece of technology we
want to build on. It may make sense to reuse ldp:Container instead of
coming up with as:Collection.
* yesterday i sent email with question on how we can 'follow our nose'
via known predicates to discover relevant containers. I already started
deploying early (thinking out loud) prototype to my website!
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2015Mar/0130.html

## MediaObject and as:Link

I propose starting with figuring out how we handle MediaObject. Actually
I chose to use them in experiments with Collections/Containers which I
currently started on my website. On linked wiki page you can find
problem statement and few additional pieces of information. Currently
AS2.0 core spec uses as:Link to handle MediaObject, personally I see
removing as:Link from the spec, resulting in making design much more
straight forward to implement.

## implicit knowledge / inference

This one I would prefer to move to next week. After deploying Containers
with Media Object on my websites, I plan to work on demo showing how
*lightweight* inference based on RDFa Vocabulary Expansion, could allow
letting publisher to chose if they use AS2.0, schema.org, microformats
etc. *vocabulary* while consumers would interpret it in exactly the same
way.

Cheers!



Received on Sunday, 22 March 2015 11:30:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:48:20 UTC