W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-shex@w3.org > May 2017

Re: proposal to amend acceptance of shacl compact syntax

From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 09:43:17 +0200
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Cc: public-shex@w3.org
Message-ID: <20170531074317.GA7668@Cicero.SpeedportEntry2090126200030>
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 06:16:10PM -0400, Eric Prudhommeaux wrote:
> Hi gang, on Friday, we agreed with Sandro's proposal that the keyword
> "SHACL" discriminate SHACL compact syntax from ShEx. Holger counter-
> proposed either "shapeClass" or "shape". Speaking to a few of you, it
> seems that "shape" serves only to muddy the waters as it is part of
> both languages (with different meanings). I expect we can all agree
> with Holger's proposal that SHACL compact syntax discriminate itself
> with the use of the keyword "shapeClass".
> PROPOSE: accept publication of the SHACL compact syntax with SHACL
> shape classes prefixed with the keyword "shapeClass".
> ericP: +1

Tom +1

Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2017 07:43:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 31 May 2017 07:43:56 UTC