W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-shex@w3.org > May 2017

Re: proposal to amend acceptance of shacl compact syntax

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 16:10:02 -0700
Cc: public-shex@w3.org
Message-Id: <A19CBB41-739B-4B53-A30C-41C5EEA1CB00@greggkellogg.net>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
> On May 30, 2017, at 3:16 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi gang, on Friday, we agreed with Sandro's proposal that the keyword
> "SHACL" discriminate SHACL compact syntax from ShEx. Holger counter-
> proposed either "shapeClass" or "shape". Speaking to a few of you, it
> seems that "shape" serves only to muddy the waters as it is part of
> both languages (with different meanings). I expect we can all agree
> with Holger's proposal that SHACL compact syntax discriminate itself
> with the use of the keyword "shapeClass".
> 
> PROPOSE: accept publication of the SHACL compact syntax with SHACL
> shape classes prefixed with the keyword "shapeClass".
> 
> ericP: +1

gkellogg: +1

Gregg

> -- 
> -ericP
> 
> office: +1.617.599.3509
> mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59
> 
> (eric@w3.org)
> Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
> email address distribution.
> 
> There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
> which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
> 
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2017 23:10:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 30 May 2017 23:10:40 UTC