- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 16:10:02 -0700
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: public-shex@w3.org
> On May 30, 2017, at 3:16 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote: > > Hi gang, on Friday, we agreed with Sandro's proposal that the keyword > "SHACL" discriminate SHACL compact syntax from ShEx. Holger counter- > proposed either "shapeClass" or "shape". Speaking to a few of you, it > seems that "shape" serves only to muddy the waters as it is part of > both languages (with different meanings). I expect we can all agree > with Holger's proposal that SHACL compact syntax discriminate itself > with the use of the keyword "shapeClass". > > PROPOSE: accept publication of the SHACL compact syntax with SHACL > shape classes prefixed with the keyword "shapeClass". > > ericP: +1 gkellogg: +1 Gregg > -- > -ericP > > office: +1.617.599.3509 > mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59 > > (eric@w3.org) > Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than > email address distribution. > > There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout > which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper. >
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2017 23:10:39 UTC