W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-shex@w3.org > May 2017

Re: proposal to amend acceptance of shacl compact syntax

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 07:03:24 -0400
To: public-shex@w3.org
Message-ID: <edf80785-ab7a-c68c-d12f-8ea2c330bf9d@dbooth.org>
On 05/30/2017 07:10 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> On May 30, 2017, at 3:16 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi gang, on Friday, we agreed with Sandro's proposal that the keyword
>> "SHACL" discriminate SHACL compact syntax from ShEx. Holger counter-
>> proposed either "shapeClass" or "shape". Speaking to a few of you, it
>> seems that "shape" serves only to muddy the waters as it is part of
>> both languages (with different meanings). I expect we can all agree
>> with Holger's proposal that SHACL compact syntax discriminate itself
>> with the use of the keyword "shapeClass".
>>
>> PROPOSE: accept publication of the SHACL compact syntax with SHACL
>> shape classes prefixed with the keyword "shapeClass".
>>
>> ericP: +1
> 
> gkellogg: +1

dbooth +1
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2017 11:04:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 31 May 2017 11:04:01 UTC