- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 07:03:24 -0400
- To: public-shex@w3.org
On 05/30/2017 07:10 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: >> On May 30, 2017, at 3:16 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote: >> >> Hi gang, on Friday, we agreed with Sandro's proposal that the keyword >> "SHACL" discriminate SHACL compact syntax from ShEx. Holger counter- >> proposed either "shapeClass" or "shape". Speaking to a few of you, it >> seems that "shape" serves only to muddy the waters as it is part of >> both languages (with different meanings). I expect we can all agree >> with Holger's proposal that SHACL compact syntax discriminate itself >> with the use of the keyword "shapeClass". >> >> PROPOSE: accept publication of the SHACL compact syntax with SHACL >> shape classes prefixed with the keyword "shapeClass". >> >> ericP: +1 > > gkellogg: +1 dbooth +1
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2017 11:04:00 UTC