W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-shex@w3.org > May 2017

Re: proposal to amend acceptance of shacl compact syntax

From: Iovka Boneva <iovka.boneva@univ-lille.fr>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 11:43:52 +0200
To: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Cc: public-shex@w3.org, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
Message-ID: <c5d241c7-de47-88d8-8d6d-3b1efb078cd0@univ-lille.fr>
Le 31/05/2017 à 09:43, Thomas Baker a écrit :
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 06:16:10PM -0400, Eric Prudhommeaux wrote:
>> Hi gang, on Friday, we agreed with Sandro's proposal that the keyword
>> "SHACL" discriminate SHACL compact syntax from ShEx. Holger counter-
>> proposed either "shapeClass" or "shape". Speaking to a few of you, it
>> seems that "shape" serves only to muddy the waters as it is part of
>> both languages (with different meanings). I expect we can all agree
>> with Holger's proposal that SHACL compact syntax discriminate itself
>> with the use of the keyword "shapeClass".
>>
>> PROPOSE: accept publication of the SHACL compact syntax with SHACL
>> shape classes prefixed with the keyword "shapeClass".
>>
>> ericP: +1
> Tom +1
>
Iovka +1

-- 
Iovka Boneva
Associate professor (MdC) Université de Lille
http://www.cristal.univ-lille.fr/~boneva/
+33 6 95 75 70 25
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2017 12:38:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 31 May 2017 12:38:40 UTC