- From: Iovka Boneva <iovka.boneva@univ-lille.fr>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 11:43:52 +0200
- To: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
- Cc: public-shex@w3.org, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
Le 31/05/2017 à 09:43, Thomas Baker a écrit : > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 06:16:10PM -0400, Eric Prudhommeaux wrote: >> Hi gang, on Friday, we agreed with Sandro's proposal that the keyword >> "SHACL" discriminate SHACL compact syntax from ShEx. Holger counter- >> proposed either "shapeClass" or "shape". Speaking to a few of you, it >> seems that "shape" serves only to muddy the waters as it is part of >> both languages (with different meanings). I expect we can all agree >> with Holger's proposal that SHACL compact syntax discriminate itself >> with the use of the keyword "shapeClass". >> >> PROPOSE: accept publication of the SHACL compact syntax with SHACL >> shape classes prefixed with the keyword "shapeClass". >> >> ericP: +1 > Tom +1 > Iovka +1 -- Iovka Boneva Associate professor (MdC) Université de Lille http://www.cristal.univ-lille.fr/~boneva/ +33 6 95 75 70 25
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2017 12:38:40 UTC