W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-shex@w3.org > May 2017

Re: proposal to amend acceptance of shacl compact syntax

From: Andra Waagmeester <andra@micelio.be>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 13:54:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMNM0fUoiF_1RiZ9LxFSO=uLe2nQyMrbahoQbsowZxT-HgPWuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Cc: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, public-shex@w3.org
Andra: +1

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org> wrote:

> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 06:16:10PM -0400, Eric Prudhommeaux wrote:
> > Hi gang, on Friday, we agreed with Sandro's proposal that the keyword
> > "SHACL" discriminate SHACL compact syntax from ShEx. Holger counter-
> > proposed either "shapeClass" or "shape". Speaking to a few of you, it
> > seems that "shape" serves only to muddy the waters as it is part of
> > both languages (with different meanings). I expect we can all agree
> > with Holger's proposal that SHACL compact syntax discriminate itself
> > with the use of the keyword "shapeClass".
> >
> > PROPOSE: accept publication of the SHACL compact syntax with SHACL
> > shape classes prefixed with the keyword "shapeClass".
> >
> > ericP: +1
>
> Tom +1
>
> --
> Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2017 12:46:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 31 May 2017 12:46:49 UTC