Re: proposal to amend acceptance of shacl compact syntax

Andra: +1

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org> wrote:

> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 06:16:10PM -0400, Eric Prudhommeaux wrote:
> > Hi gang, on Friday, we agreed with Sandro's proposal that the keyword
> > "SHACL" discriminate SHACL compact syntax from ShEx. Holger counter-
> > proposed either "shapeClass" or "shape". Speaking to a few of you, it
> > seems that "shape" serves only to muddy the waters as it is part of
> > both languages (with different meanings). I expect we can all agree
> > with Holger's proposal that SHACL compact syntax discriminate itself
> > with the use of the keyword "shapeClass".
> >
> > PROPOSE: accept publication of the SHACL compact syntax with SHACL
> > shape classes prefixed with the keyword "shapeClass".
> >
> > ericP: +1
>
> Tom +1
>
> --
> Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
>
>