- From: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:03:21 -0500
- To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- Cc: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote: > With Karen we have simplified the pagination description. > > Can I have some +1/-1 voting and any comments for: > > 1) Adding numberOfPages to PublicationVolume & Article > > 2) Proposing to public-vocabs as 'Periodicals, Articles, and Multi-volume > Works' with the tweaks described applied (minor) I've edited the proposal to use consistent styles when providing examples for properties. schema.org itself isn't very consistent on this front; they currently use a mix of emdashes, semicolons, parentheses, and entirely new sentences. I've changed the primary Article example to use pageStart / pageEnd rather than pagination as the page run was 360-380, a pretty clear case of where pageStart / pageEnd should be used. However, that leaves us without an example of pagination. We should also probably add numberOfPages to the separate books in the LotR example. I've removed the "rough" proposal that Niklas had added, per the concerns I expressed previously about invalid properties like issn hanging off of PublicationIssue. [1] As this is just a draft, I guess we're expecting to do more work later to add individual examples for each class, with an introductory sentence, the original HTML, and the marked-up with schema.org version? Are we going to mention anything about our attempts to align portions of the proposal with parts of bibo in the proposal itself? P.S. It might have been a good idea to start a new thread when calling for votes. 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemabibex/2013Dec/0125.html
Received on Wednesday, 18 December 2013 15:03:49 UTC