- From: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:04:03 -0500
- To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- Cc: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote: > I have now updated the Article proposal to reflect the very productive > discussion in yesterday’s meeting. > > Next step is to check: > > I did what we said I believe we agreed to use either "pagination" or "pageNumbers" to avoid conflicting with "pages, as in the (usually young) people who assist knights, members of Parliament, or shelve books in libraries; or a form of communication popular in the late 20th century". I may have been muted when I tried to point out during the meeting that Bibo uses "pageEnd" and "pageStart" as the names of the properties. Per (a) in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemabibex/2013Dec/0077.html, if we're minting new properties and want to align with Bibo, I would recommend sticking with their property names instead of the proposed "endPage" / "startPage". It also keeps the two properties clustered together in the schema.org documentation. > We are happy with the descriptive text Further on "pages", the current definition overlaps with the existing numberOfPages property. We probably want to avoid that. Also, per (c) in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemabibex/2013Dec/0077.html, we need to change the definition of "pages" to better align with Bibo, now that we have the "pageEnd" and "pageStart" properties. Something like: 'Describes the pagination of works that do not run across consecutively numbered pages and thus cannot be simply described by pageStart and pageEnd (for example, "1-6, 9, 55" or "10-12, 46-49").' > I changed the example correctly We still need to add itemprop="isPartOf" to connect the article to the issue, volume, and periodical. Are we aiming for "article isPartOf issue, which isPartOf volume, which isPartOf Periodical"? > Add more examples - I will copy in the Lord of the Rings multi-volume work > example from the Collection proposal I would also suggest adding versions of the examples from http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Periodical which include the standard schema.org introductory sentence of the example for context, as well as the before / after schema.org markup. Let me know if you want me to make any of these changes. Thanks, Dan
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 21:04:31 UTC