RE: Article Proposal

+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karen Coyle [mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net]
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 1:06 PM
> To: public-schemabibex@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Article Proposal
> 
> Richard, thanks. My only comment is that I didn't expect the pagination
> properties to also be on volume. I believed that having them on issue
> and article should suffice.
> 
> *However* I was not considering volume for multi-volume monographs...
> so with that extension, this probably makes sense.
> 
> Therefore... AOK
> 
> kc
> 
> On 12/12/13, 9:43 AM, Wallis,Richard wrote:
> > I have now updated the Article
> > <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Article> proposal to
> > reflect the very productive discussion in yesterday's meeting
> > <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Meet_20131211>.
> >
> > Next step is to check:
> >
> >   * I did what we said
> >   * We are happy with the descriptive text
> >   * I changed the example correctly
> >   * Add more examples - I will copy in the Lord of the Rings
> >     multi-volume work example from the Collection proposal
> >
> >
> >
> > ~Richard
> >
> 
> --
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet

Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 18:10:24 UTC