Re: Article Proposal

Richard, thanks. My only comment is that I didn't expect the pagination 
properties to also be on volume. I believed that having them on issue 
and article should suffice.

*However* I was not considering volume for multi-volume monographs... so 
with that extension, this probably makes sense.

Therefore... AOK

kc

On 12/12/13, 9:43 AM, Wallis,Richard wrote:
> I have now updated the Article
> <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Article> proposal to
> reflect the very productive discussion in yesterday’s meeting
> <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Meet_20131211>.
>
> Next step is to check:
>
>   * I did what we said
>   * We are happy with the descriptive text
>   * I changed the example correctly
>   * Add more examples - I will copy in the Lord of the Rings
>     multi-volume work example from the Collection proposal
>
>
>
> ~Richard
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 18:06:04 UTC