- From: Dan Scott <denials@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:07:47 -0500
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > I, too, like that idea. They have solved many of the problems we've brought > up by having > > 1) a "document" class to which monographs, periodicals, and articles can be > sub- > > 2) a property that represents a stylized citation, like those used for > articles: > > Property: bibo:locator > > locator – A description (often numeric) that locates an item within a > containing document or collection. > > URI: > http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/locator > Domain: > bibo:Document > Range: > rdfs:Literal > Subproperties: > bibo:chapter, bibo:issue, bibo:pageEnd, bibo:pageStart, bibo:pages, > bibo:section, bibo:volume > > In this, proposer, volumes, issues, chapters, pages, etc. are all > subproperties. This makes creating markup of a citation easier than trying > to make the citation use a hierarchical structure describes the top-down > relationship between periodicals or books and their parts. I think this would be one good part of what I've proposed for a follow-on effort to bring more alignment between Bibo and schema.org (part 2 of http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemabibex/2013Dec/0076.html).
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 17:14:18 UTC