- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:58:59 +0100
- To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
On 19/09/2024 13:46, James Anderson wrote:
>
>> On 19. Sep 2024, at 14:36, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 17/09/2024 05:21, Franconi Enrico wrote:
>>> • In general, when named graphs in a dataset have different origin, you cannot assume that the same blank node label in different named graphs represents the same blank node.
>>
>> Yes.
>> The act of "putting a named graph in a dataset" requires blank node label handling in the same way RDF graph merge does.
>
> as enrico noted earlier in the list in that same message, the choice between a merge and a union is a matter of definition.
Union or merge of graphs (data model) do not work on blank node labels.
blank node labels from different origins (syntax) can not be put in a
TriG document available (item 3) without renaming apart.
Andy
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2024 18:59:06 UTC