- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:58:59 +0100
- To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
On 19/09/2024 13:46, James Anderson wrote: > >> On 19. Sep 2024, at 14:36, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: >> >> On 17/09/2024 05:21, Franconi Enrico wrote: >>> • In general, when named graphs in a dataset have different origin, you cannot assume that the same blank node label in different named graphs represents the same blank node. >> >> Yes. >> The act of "putting a named graph in a dataset" requires blank node label handling in the same way RDF graph merge does. > > as enrico noted earlier in the list in that same message, the choice between a merge and a union is a matter of definition. Union or merge of graphs (data model) do not work on blank node labels. blank node labels from different origins (syntax) can not be put in a TriG document available (item 3) without renaming apart. Andy
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2024 18:59:06 UTC