Re: Presentation about reifiers and graphs

My questions/comments:

A propositional atom ==> what is this?
A new primitive ==> A new term
Atomic (like literals) ==> Uh? It is not atomic…
Triple Terms are Abstract ==> I would add: denote one-to-one a resource
Slides 15  and 17 ==> Uh? It is not clear at all what you want to say. It is probably enough to say that reifiers and triple terms are in a many-to-many relation via rdf:reifies.
Slides 19 and 20 ==> Uh? It is not clear at all what you want to say. It i probably enough to say: a set of triples associated to the same identifier can not be seen as a named graph, since the scope of the bnodes in that graph is not limited within that graph but it spans the whole main graph.

—e.

Received on Monday, 16 September 2024 13:24:41 UTC