public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from April 2006 by thread

Error in sparql-protocol-query.wsdl detected by Apache Woden Arthur Ryman (Wednesday, 26 April)

• Re: Error in sparql-protocol-query.wsdl detected by Apache Woden Kendall Clark (Thursday, 27 April)

FILTER evaluation problem Jorge Pérez (Thursday, 20 April)

Comment on SPARQL CR Olivier Corby (Wednesday, 19 April)

Abiguities in combination of group graph patterns Jorge Pérez (Wednesday, 19 April)

• Re: Abiguities in combination of group graph patterns Seaborne, Andy (Monday, 24 April)
  • Re: Abiguities in combination of group graph patterns Jorge Pérez (Monday, 24 April)
    • Re: Abiguities in combination of group graph patterns Seaborne, Andy (Monday, 24 April)

Ambiguities in optional scope Jorge Pérez (Wednesday, 19 April)

• Re: Ambiguities in optional scope Seaborne, Andy (Thursday, 20 April)
  • Re: Ambiguities in optional scope Jorge Pérez (Thursday, 20 April)

reporting of possible ambiguities in the SPARQL documents Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 18 April)

• Re: reporting of possible ambiguities in the SPARQL documents Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 18 April)
  • Re: reporting of possible ambiguities in the SPARQL documents Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 18 April)

Re: Late, but possibly useful, comments on SPARQL Last Call WD Seaborne, Andy (Wednesday, 12 April)

• Re: Late, but possibly useful, comments on SPARQL Last Call WD Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 12 April)
  • Re: Late, but possibly useful, comments on SPARQL Last Call WD Jim Melton (Thursday, 13 April)
• Re: Late, but possibly useful, comments on SPARQL Last Call WD Jim Melton (Thursday, 13 April)

Missing test case result file Geoff Chappell (Sunday, 9 April)

• Re: Missing test case result file Jeen Broekstra (Monday, 10 April)

Test case w/unsupported datatypes Geoff Chappell (Friday, 7 April)

Test/grammar question Geoff Chappell (Thursday, 6 April)

• Re: Test/grammar question Seaborne, Andy (Monday, 10 April)
  • Re: Test/grammar question Dan Connolly (Monday, 10 April)

[CLOSED] Re: [OK?] (entailment, soundness, completeness) Ian Horrocks (Monday, 3 April)

Formal defintion of nested optionals Jorge Pérez (Friday, 31 March)

• Re: Formal defintion of nested optionals Seaborne, Andy (Thursday, 13 April)
  • Re: Formal defintion of nested optionals Jorge Pérez (Thursday, 13 April)
    • Re: Formal defintion of nested optionals Seaborne, Andy (Tuesday, 18 April)
      • Re: Formal defintion of nested optionals Jorge Pérez (Tuesday, 18 April)
• RE: Formal defintion of nested optionals Seaborne, Andy (Tuesday, 18 April)

Last message date: Thursday, 27 April 2006 12:43:19 UTC