Re: Late, but possibly useful, comments on SPARQL Last Call WD

Dan,

Ahhh, thanks for the pointer!
    Jim

At 4/12/2006 07:31 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
>On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 10:51 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> > Jim,
> >
> > Thank you for the comments: changes noted and explanation as noted below:
>
>By the way, these changes are in an editor's draft, to be published
>in due course
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
>
>We didn't get to them in time to include them in the recent CR.
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-rdf-sparql-query-20060406/
>
>
> > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20060220/
> > >
> >
>--
>Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

========================================================================
Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL)     Phone: +1.801.942.0144
   Co-Chair, W3C XML Query WG; F&O (etc.) editor    Fax : +1.801.942.3345
Oracle Corporation        Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com
1930 Viscounti Drive      Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org
Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA          Personal email: jim at melton dot name
========================================================================
=  Facts are facts.   But any opinions expressed are the opinions      =
=  only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody   =
=  else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand.  =
======================================================================== 

Received on Thursday, 13 April 2006 20:20:05 UTC