- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:19:10 +0100
- To: Geoff Chappell <gchappell@intellidimension.com>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Geoff Chappell wrote: > > > Hi, > > I just started running through the test cases to see what I needed to do > to bring my sparql implementation up to date. I got a parsing error on > the test: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#bgp-bnode-predicate-1 > > which didn’t surprise me since I figured the grammar had likely changed > some since I last looked. > > I can’t seem to see how the published grammar would accept the > BLANK_NODE_LABEL, though, in that position. Am I missing something, or > is this a problem with the grammar? > > Thanks, > > Geoff The grammar will no longer accept a blank node in the predicate decision. This was clarified only recently (the definitions and the grammar were out of step for a time). The tests involving blank nodes in the predicate position need fixing. Thanks for pointing it out Andy
Received on Monday, 10 April 2006 15:19:25 UTC