- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:27:32 -0500
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- Cc: Geoff Chappell <gchappell@intellidimension.com>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 16:19 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > > Geoff Chappell wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I just started running through the test cases to see what I needed to do > > to bring my sparql implementation up to date. I got a parsing error on > > the test: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#bgp-bnode-predicate-1 > > > > which didnąt surprise me since I figured the grammar had likely changed > > some since I last looked. > > > > I canąt seem to see how the published grammar would accept the > > BLANK_NODE_LABEL, though, in that position. Am I missing something, or > > is this a problem with the grammar? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Geoff > > The grammar will no longer accept a blank node in the predicate decision. > This was clarified only recently (the definitions and the grammar were out of > step for a time). The tests involving blank nodes in the predicate position > need fixing. Andy, I need to find the relevant WG decisions and make sure they're linked from http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#punctuationSyntax Any help you can give is appreciated. It's not urgent. Maybe they already are linked. I intend to double-check somehow. > > Thanks for pointing it out > Andy -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E office: tel:+1-617-395-0241 mobile: tel:+1-816-616-6576 mobile: mailto:connolly+pager@w3.org
Received on Monday, 10 April 2006 15:27:39 UTC