- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:03:43 -0600
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
> *** Language features *** > where's the INSERT? Somewhere between low-priority and out-of-scope. We discussed the state-of-the-art in insert/update and other future directions at a recent meeting... update/insert/manage http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf5-bos.html#item_03 Comments like this about scope/features are more relevant to our use cases and requirements document http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-dawg-uc/ than to the query language spec. Our charter says... "The RDF Data Access Working Group is only required to defined a protocol for conveying queries and their results. However, the group should be aware that it is likely that their work will be extended to support modifying the graph and should expend reasonable effort to ensure that such extension is easy, moreover, the group may include such an ability." http://www.w3.org/2003/12/swa/dawg-charter#update insert/update isn't among our requirements or even objectives so far. i.e. the WG seems to think we can advance the state of the art without doing INSERT just yet. If you think W3C shouldn't do a QL at all without insert, please elaborate. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 20:22:17 UTC