[RESOLVED] Re: ISSUE-139 Resolution
Addendum: Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35
comment on rdf semantics
ISSUE-139 Resolution
ISSUE-140 Resolution
N-Triples LC WD typos
nanopublications are they ok with RDF graphs?
rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35
- Jeremy J Carroll (Tuesday, 17 September)
- David Booth (Thursday, 12 September)
- Sandro Hawke (Thursday, 12 September)
- Pat Hayes (Thursday, 12 September)
- David Booth (Thursday, 12 September)
- Jeremy J Carroll (Wednesday, 11 September)
- Pat Hayes (Tuesday, 10 September)
- Gregg Reynolds (Tuesday, 10 September)
- Jeremy J Carroll (Monday, 9 September)
- Jeremy J Carroll (Monday, 9 September)
- Pat Hayes (Monday, 9 September)
- Sandro Hawke (Saturday, 7 September)
- Jeremy J Carroll (Friday, 6 September)
references and acknowledgements …. (trumpet blowing)
Regarding 6. Fragment Identifiers in http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130723/#section-fragID (tracker, this is on ISSUE-141)
Regarding the SHOULD for NFC in RDF Literals
reified statements in Turtle
TriG test suite issues
Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine
Last message date: Monday, 30 September 2013 13:22:06 UTC