- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 22:01:54 -0400
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- CC: public-rdf-comments Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
I am satisfied with this resolution. Thanks! David Booth On 09/04/2013 06:32 PM, David Wood wrote: > Hi David, > > The RDF Working Group decided today [1] to resolve ISSUE-139 [2] > (More clearly warn that "generalized RDF" is non-standard) by > adopting your proposed language. The exact resolution was: [[ > RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-139 using David Booth's proposed solution at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Aug/0002.html. > Exact wording will be considered editorial. ]] > > Please advise whether this addresses your concern. Thank you. > > Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-09-04#resolution_3 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/139 >
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2013 02:02:25 UTC