Monday, 28 May 2012
- RE: Definition of "Resource"
 - RE: Definition of "Resource"
 - Re: Definition of "Resource"
 - Re: Definition of "Resource"
 - RE: Definition of "Resource"
 - Re: Definition of "Resource"
 
Saturday, 26 May 2012
Friday, 25 May 2012
- Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs
 - Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs
 
Thursday, 24 May 2012
- Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - RE: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - RE: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs
 - Re: Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - RE: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Request for FPWD via RDF WG of JSON-LD Syntax and API specs
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 
Wednesday, 23 May 2012
- Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 
Tuesday, 22 May 2012
- Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - RE: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - RE: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - Re: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 - RE: JSON-LD Syntax request for FPWD via RDF WG
 
Monday, 21 May 2012
- Re: Use of xml:base in rdf:HTML Datatype
 - Re: Comments regarding "Turtle and N-Triples Synaxes for RDF"
 - Re: Use of xml:base in rdf:HTML Datatype
 
Saturday, 19 May 2012
Friday, 18 May 2012
- Use of xml:base in rdf:HTML Datatype
 - Use of xml:base in rdf:HTML Datatype
 - Re: The rdf:JSONLiteral datatype
 
Thursday, 17 May 2012
- Re: The rdf:JSONLiteral datatype
 - Re: The rdf:JSONLiteral datatype
 - Re: The rdf:JSONLiteral datatype
 - Re: The rdf:JSONLiteral datatype
 - Re: The rdf:JSONLiteral datatype
 - Re: The rdf:JSONLiteral datatype
 - Re: The rdf:JSONLiteral datatype
 - Re: Subsection 11.2 - Displaying (X)HTML
 - The rdf:JSONLiteral datatype
 - Subsection 11.2 - Displaying (X)HTML
 
Wednesday, 16 May 2012
- Re: Comment on RDF 1.1: use case for HTML5 data type
 - Re: Comment on RDF 1.1: use case for HTML5 data type
 
Wednesday, 9 May 2012
- Re: Comments about the rdf:XMLLiteral datatype
 - Re: Comments about the rdf:XMLLiteral datatype
 - Re: Comments about the rdf:XMLLiteral datatype
 - Re: Comments about the rdf:XMLLiteral datatype
 - Comments about the rdf:XMLLiteral datatype
 
Friday, 4 May 2012
- Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 
Thursday, 3 May 2012
- Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates
 - Literals as subjects in Turtle (but not in the RDF model) [was: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates]
 - Re: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates
 - Re: Inverses of RDF and RDFS predicates
 - Re: Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title
 - Please put "N-Triples" in the specification title
 - Re: Aligning NTriples grammar with Turtle grammar