- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 20:44:39 +0100
- To: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Cc: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Hi Dominik, Thanks for the comments! It's great to get such quick feedback on the new text :-) Responses inline. On 9 May 2012, at 20:25, Dominik Tomaszuk wrote: > We have two comments regarding the rdf:XMLLiteral datatype in [1]: > 1. In the value space there is a typo. It is "DocumentFragments", but I think it should be "DocumentFragment". Where? The word is used twice: “The value space is a set of DOM DocumentFragments” “Two DocumentFragments A and B are considered equal if …” Plural seems correct in both cases. > 2. In subsection 4.2 you refer to DOM3. Maybe a better idea would be to refer to DOM4 [2]? DOM4 is still a W3C Working Draft and not yet a W3C Recommendation. W3C policy is to avoid normative references to working drafts, to avoid situations where conforming implementations may become non-conforming when a normatively referenced work-in-progress spec changes. Exceptions are possible if there are good reasons, but AFAIK the definitions that we need from the DOM spec are fine as they are in DOM3. (RDF-WG is considering adding an HTML datatype, and in that case we'd probably reference the HTML5 Working Draft.) Thanks again, Richard > > [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/5d1f10084f79/rdf-concepts/index.html# > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-dom-20120405/ > > Best regards, > > Dominik Tomaszuk > >
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 19:45:09 UTC