- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:59:35 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29702
Bug ID: 29702
Summary: [XP31] Production rules in the text not unambiguous as
a result of missing annotations
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Candidate Recommendation
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: editorial
Priority: P2
Component: XPath 3.1
Assignee: jonathan.robie@gmail.com
Reporter: abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl
QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Target Milestone: ---
As a result of [1], [2], [3] and [4] and the resolution in [5], caused by
confusion about missing production annotations, the Joined WG asked me to write
an editorial bug about improving the production rules that appear within the
body of the specification.
The issue at hand: the production rules within the text do not maintain the
annotations in A.1 EBNF, which confuses competent readers.
Proposal (my recollection of discussion in telcon #647)
1) Remove the following sentence from A.1
"To increase readability, the EBNF in the main body of this document omits some
of these notational features. This appendix is the normative version of the
EBNF."
2) Update the stylesheets such that the annotations become part of the
productions within the text, so that they are normatively equivalent.
3) Leave section A.1 as the Normative EBNF.
[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-query/2016Jun/0047.html
[2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-query/2016Jun/0049.html
[3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-query/2016Jun/0053.html
[4] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-query/2016Jun/0056.html
[5] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-query/2016Jun/0057.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 15:59:38 UTC