- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:59:35 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29702 Bug ID: 29702 Summary: [XP31] Production rules in the text not unambiguous as a result of missing annotations Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Candidate Recommendation Hardware: PC OS: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: editorial Priority: P2 Component: XPath 3.1 Assignee: jonathan.robie@gmail.com Reporter: abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl QA Contact: public-qt-comments@w3.org Target Milestone: --- As a result of [1], [2], [3] and [4] and the resolution in [5], caused by confusion about missing production annotations, the Joined WG asked me to write an editorial bug about improving the production rules that appear within the body of the specification. The issue at hand: the production rules within the text do not maintain the annotations in A.1 EBNF, which confuses competent readers. Proposal (my recollection of discussion in telcon #647) 1) Remove the following sentence from A.1 "To increase readability, the EBNF in the main body of this document omits some of these notational features. This appendix is the normative version of the EBNF." 2) Update the stylesheets such that the annotations become part of the productions within the text, so that they are normatively equivalent. 3) Leave section A.1 as the Normative EBNF. [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-query/2016Jun/0047.html [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-query/2016Jun/0049.html [3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-query/2016Jun/0053.html [4] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-query/2016Jun/0056.html [5] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsl-query/2016Jun/0057.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 15:59:38 UTC