- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:35:07 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29702 --- Comment #3 from Abel Braaksma <abel.braaksma@xs4all.nl> --- (In reply to Michael Dyck from comment #2) > > > > 3) Leave section A.1 as the Normative EBNF. > > But if A,1 is the normative EBNF, shouldn't we still say that it is? Yes, I thought that was the idea. With "leave", I meant "leave it in as", i.e., keep the status quo that A.1 is Normative. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2016 07:35:24 UTC