W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > June 2016

[Bug 29702] [XP31] Production rules in the text not unambiguous as a result of missing annotations

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:06:36 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-29702-523-OmmwQL67KV@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29702

--- Comment #2 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> ---
(In reply to Abel Braaksma from comment #0)
> 
> 1) Remove the following sentence from A.1
> 
> "To increase readability, the EBNF in the main body of this document omits
> some of these notational features. This appendix is the normative version of
> the EBNF."
> 
> 3) Leave section A.1 as the Normative EBNF.

But if A,1 is the normative EBNF, shouldn't we still say that it is?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2016 15:06:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:58:01 UTC